Jeezla Posted March 15, 2021 Share Posted March 15, 2021 That juice ain't worth the squeeze 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted March 15, 2021 Share Posted March 15, 2021 Like 5.5 the first year. Didn't expect that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LinderFournette Posted March 15, 2021 Share Posted March 15, 2021 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swift21 Posted March 15, 2021 Share Posted March 15, 2021 (edited) I would have let him walk. You have too many more important needs at left tackle, center, corner and edge rusher to pay a FB 5 mil next year that only plays roughly 30 percent of the snaps. Edited March 15, 2021 by Swift21 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TecmoSuperJoe Posted March 15, 2021 Share Posted March 15, 2021 (edited) 8 hours ago, 49erurtaza said: Love juice but seems to be a waste of money. Would of liked to see them figure out how to replace him. Shanahan wants his elite fullback in his offense. It was going to happen. Still not as stupid as the Malcom Smith deal. But yeah, his heir apparent should have been in the lineup already. Whoever it is, you'd think they'd be getting 60 to 70 catches a year like Rathman, Craig, or Centers did. At least with Kyle running the show. Edited March 15, 2021 by TecmoSuperJoe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TecmoSuperJoe Posted March 15, 2021 Share Posted March 15, 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FinSting Posted March 15, 2021 Share Posted March 15, 2021 4 hours ago, Swift21 said: I would have let him walk. You have too many more important needs at left tackle, center, corner and edge rusher to pay a FB 5 mil next year that only plays roughly 30 percent of the snaps. No no, you build a team with a FB first. The foundation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roninho Posted March 15, 2021 Share Posted March 15, 2021 5 hours ago, Swift21 said: I would have let him walk. You have too many more important needs at left tackle, center, corner and edge rusher to pay a FB 5 mil next year that only plays roughly 30 percent of the snaps. i wonder when you sign someone else for FB for $1 mio how many holes you can fill with the remaining $4 mio. You can sign a Mario edwards (who? exactly) impact type of guy at d-line for that. I have no issues with a franchise spending $5 mio on a guy who is special at his position Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted March 15, 2021 Share Posted March 15, 2021 2 minutes ago, Roninho said: i wonder when you sign someone else for FB for $1 mio how many holes you can fill with the remaining $4 mio. You can sign a Mario edwards (who? exactly) impact type of guy at d-line for that. I have no issues with a franchise spending $5 mio on a guy who is special at his position What about that $4M being used to up an offer from $3M to $7M? That extra money can move you up a tier in players. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roninho Posted March 15, 2021 Share Posted March 15, 2021 Yeah that is a fair point. I guess i just don't have that much issue spending $ on a FB if he is special. I'm a Raiders fan and we used to have Marcel Reece at FB and we paid him 3 mio a year for a couple of years when the cap was lower. Never had an issue with spending that on him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
49erurtaza Posted March 15, 2021 Share Posted March 15, 2021 1 hour ago, squire12 said: What about that $4M being used to up an offer from $3M to $7M? That extra money can move you up a tier in players. If they miss out on Trent Williams do to a few million yearly then this is dumb re-sign. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G Posted March 15, 2021 Share Posted March 15, 2021 13 hours ago, squire12 said: Now that is an interesting way to make room for Watson!!!! Everything BURNS!!! Even Watson's contract. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BucsDraftGeek47 Posted March 15, 2021 Share Posted March 15, 2021 Love to see a FB get some love i wont go as far as saying it is a great move but he actually plays in this offense so 🤷♂️ they should use FBs more in TE capacity these days imo that would be a fascinating matchup nightmare to have guys that can carry the rock and line up as TEs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted March 15, 2021 Share Posted March 15, 2021 6 minutes ago, BucsDraftGeek47 said: Love to see a FB get some love i wont go as far as saying it is a great move but he actually plays in this offense so 🤷♂️ they should use FBs more in TE capacity these days imo that would be a fascinating matchup nightmare to have guys that can carry the rock and line up as TEs Yes, they should. I wouldn't have nearly the problem with the deal that I do from a cost efficiency if he were getting 60 targets / 40 catches a year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oregon Ducks Posted March 15, 2021 Share Posted March 15, 2021 They got rid of Buckner to sign a fullback. Yikes... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.