RaidersAreOne Posted March 15, 2021 Share Posted March 15, 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted March 15, 2021 Share Posted March 15, 2021 There's never a plan B 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psychlone Posted March 15, 2021 Share Posted March 15, 2021 They better be very very confident they have Williams and Verrett just about inked up before spending so much on a limited budget on priority #4 or 5. Gotta think the guarantees are minimal aside the bonus after year 2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GW21 Posted March 15, 2021 Share Posted March 15, 2021 13 minutes ago, Psychlone said: They better be very very confident they have Williams and Verrett just about inked up before spending so much on a limited budget on priority #4 or 5. Gotta think the guarantees are minimal aside the bonus after year 2. Said 10 mil guaranteed. Hopefully that money is all at the front end of the contract so we can get out of it the last couple of years. Not necessarily this year, but over the next two-three years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NcFinest9erFan Posted March 15, 2021 Share Posted March 15, 2021 #49ers and 5-time Pro Bowl FB Kyle Juszczyk agreed to a 5-year, $27m contract, with $10m gtd. He originally signed a 4-year, $21m deal ($5.25m/season) in March of 2017, which was set to expire on Wednesday. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GW21 Posted March 15, 2021 Share Posted March 15, 2021 At least according to this tweet... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted March 15, 2021 Share Posted March 15, 2021 14 minutes ago, GW21 said: Said 10 mil guaranteed. Hopefully that money is all at the front end of the contract so we can get out of it the last couple of years. Not necessarily this year, but over the next two-three years. I'd guess it's almost entirely signing bonus. Spread over 5 years, it's 2 per. I'd guess his base is vet minimum this year, maybe next. If that's the case, probably like 2 years 12 million. Maybe only 8 in signing bonus and two years at vet minimum fully locked in. That's 2 years, about 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NcFinest9erFan Posted March 15, 2021 Share Posted March 15, 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-ALL-DAY Posted March 15, 2021 Share Posted March 15, 2021 If it wasn't clear, Rapoport is definitely the national reporter that is the most plugged in with the organization. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted March 15, 2021 Share Posted March 15, 2021 1 minute ago, NcFinest9erFan said: Well there goes that. We seriously just spent 25% of our net cap for this year on a fullback?? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GW21 Posted March 15, 2021 Share Posted March 15, 2021 1 minute ago, J-ALL-DAY said: If it wasn't clear, Rapoport is definitely the national reporter that is the most plugged in with the organization. Not disputing this in any way, but why do you say that? John Lynch basically came out and told us this was coming. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-ALL-DAY Posted March 15, 2021 Share Posted March 15, 2021 Just now, GW21 said: Not disputing this in any way, but why do you say that? John Lynch basically came out and told us this was coming. Look at his reports and how they are reported. He reports directly from the organization perspective. When it comes out that the team reached out for an available QB, it is Rapoport who will quickly shoot it down saying it never happened or it wasn't anything serious. And Lynch saying it was coming doesn't mean much since Rapoport still broke the signing before anyone and the details of the signing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted March 15, 2021 Share Posted March 15, 2021 Not a move I would have made. Ultimately, likely to be harmless.... Maybe. That first year cap hit is a weird choice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John232 Posted March 15, 2021 Share Posted March 15, 2021 God, I hate it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aussie9er Posted March 15, 2021 Share Posted March 15, 2021 2 minutes ago, Forge said: Not a move I would have made. Ultimately, likely to be harmless.... Maybe. That first year cap hit is a weird choice. The same I would not have made the move running backs / full backs are so replaceable thru the draft at such a cheap rate compared resigning them. Made no sense to me to spend our limit cap like this. Drives me nuts we didn’t try to save some money on this. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.