Jump to content

FFMD 2021 Detroit Lions War Room


Superduperman

Recommended Posts

I don't want to jump on @Superduperman and push out from FFMD and/or the forum in general. This is an exercise that is supposed to help bring us all together, get us thinking about prospects in different rounds, strategies that may be useful, etc. 

What I would personally like to see, is Supes continue on as GM but that we do follow a closer pattern to what we did last year. Open things up to the group, create a poll and have everyone be involved in the process. I have zero issues if Supes wants to be the tie breaker on something since it could go either way. 

Let's use this as a way to unify the group instead of dividing. We have a new group in charge (Sheila/Holmes/Campbell) and things are looking to be moving forward on the right track. Let's do the same. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just going to throw this out there as a way of moving forward:

Caleb Farley is still on the board and the Dolphins are looking to move down from 18. It might make sense to consider packaging our 2nd and some 3rds to get up there seeing as the position is now a gaping hole. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, winitall said:

Just going to throw this out there as a way of moving forward:

Caleb Farley is still on the board and the Dolphins are looking to move down from 18. It might make sense to consider packaging our 2nd and some 3rds to get up there seeing as the position is now a gaping hole. 

See if they would consider Michael Gallup and a 3rd.  Would hate to use a 2nd to move up but it might be the only real option.  We could use the third from Dallas and our 2nd to move up.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Sllim Pickens said:

See if they would consider Michael Gallup and a 3rd.  Would hate to use a 2nd to move up but it might be the only real option.  We could use the third from Dallas and our 2nd to move up.  

The sad part is... that is probably not going to be anywhere close to what would be needed to do it. It seems almost inevitable to have to use the 2nd. It's the waste of a lot of resources to pick a guy that has as many question marks about him as the guy who was just traded. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Karnage84 said:

The sad part is... that is probably not going to be anywhere close to what would be needed to do it. It seems almost inevitable to have to use the 2nd. It's the waste of a lot of resources to pick a guy that has as many question marks about him as the guy who was just traded. 

Yeah, would be Okudah and our 2nd for Gallup and Farley.  Looks awful on paper but it looks better than whatever else we have starting at CB.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...