Jump to content

Whom do you want the Vikings to take in the draft? 1st, 3rds, 4ths.


Recommended Posts

The team should never pass up a QB that they feel is a franchise QB, but assuming one of those won't be there when the Vikings pick, and there is no reasonable way for the team to trade their way into a position to get one of them -- put me in the camp that wants to see the team address the trenches with more of an emphasis on the offensive trench.

If there is a decent value offensive lineman at 14 pick him. Otherwise, trade down to where the team is comfortable they'll be able to get an offensive lineman with it not being a reach. Then an ideal next two picks would be another offensive lineman and a defensive end.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Trading back from 14 and gaining a second round pick would be an ideal day one. I’d like to think Vera-Tucker or Wyatt Davis would good options in the early to mid 20s to fill in at OG, with Cleveland moving over to T. Would then love to grab a DE in round two. If a good value DE falls, I’d jump all over that. With the FA moves made in the secondary, im much less concerned. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

If they are going to trade down, I’d love to see them trade with Jacksonville, sending 14 in exchange for 25 and 45. Just for the overnight ranting about Spielman getting his original 2nd back. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Perry's Permutational Prognostications...

Rd 1: OL > S > DL

Rd 3a: If Rd 1 OL, then S > DL > OL

Rd 3a: If Rd 1 S, then OL > DL

Rd 3a: If Rd 1 DL, then OL > DL

Rd 3b: OL

RD 4a-d: best available from positions OL, DL, S, WR

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, perrynoid said:

Perry's Permutational Prognostications...

Rd 1: OL > S > DL

Rd 3a: If Rd 1 OL, then S > DL > OL

Rd 3a: If Rd 1 S, then OL > DL

Rd 3a: If Rd 1 DL, then OL > DL

Rd 3b: OL

RD 4a-d: best available from positions OL, DL, S, WR

 

Safety in the 3rd even after the Woods signing?

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, viking said:

Safety in the 3rd even after the Woods signing?

Yes; we only have for all practical purposes, 2 NFL-caliber safeties on our roster, and isn't Woods a FA after next year?  We have quality starters/depth at most positions except for guard and safety, it would be nice to bolster those positions through the draft, especially since the FO has done a nice job in FA so far in bolstering the other weaknesses on the roster.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I want either in order Darrisaw, Slater, AVT in the 1st. In the 3rd a DE like Roche or Kaindoh and a speedy WR like Anthony Schwartz. 4th Safety like Caden Sterns, OG like Trey Smith, LB like KJ Britt. 

Then you take BPA after that. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Build the trenches easily, I wouldn’t mind us taking a CB with our later picks to hopefully get him ready for next year when we lose some of our players from this year and so we aren’t relying on starting a rookie CB. 
 

A QB obviously if we fall in love with one because I still don’t believe Kirk can lead this team or any team to a SB. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If-then scenarios are fun!   If the Vikes get one of these stud DEs at 14, then I see OL, OL, S and WR as a great depth/future starter exercise.   Yes, a Kyle Trask type could enter in there.   One of the DTs could slip too, so getting someone like Twyman in the 4th is possible.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...