KingOfNewYork 3,420 Posted Monday at 01:58 PM Share Posted Monday at 01:58 PM 10 hours ago, ET80 said: Are they doing similar setups for Mac or Fields? If not, I'd say it's pretty much locked that Lance is going to be the pick. I imagine that Lance will ace the workout... Fields had already been working with Beck, they did make some suggestions in Fields workout. This one seems to be way more hands on. I've always thought Lance was the guy since they made the trade and IMO I think he's their #1 they just want to be 100% sure and this might help. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
KingOfNewYork 3,420 Posted Monday at 02:01 PM Share Posted Monday at 02:01 PM 5 hours ago, Hunter2_1 said: I feel like Lance would suit the 49ers style of offense, with his team using motion and him being under center a lot. But I also feel 3 is too early and they're going after either Fields or Wilson. Lance maybe a bit too inaccurate for them, considering they're going to move off Jimmy 3 isn't early at all because he wasn't getting to 12 and you cant risk waiting for him to drop and moving up from 12 to 5/6/7 would still be costly. Pay the extra 1 to get to 3 and control your own destiny. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Hunter2_1 3,743 Posted Monday at 02:33 PM Share Posted Monday at 02:33 PM 31 minutes ago, KingOfNewYork said: 3 isn't early at all because he wasn't getting to 12 and you cant risk waiting for him to drop and moving up from 12 to 5/6/7 would still be costly. Pay the extra 1 to get to 3 and control your own destiny. Yeah I agree, what I mean is I think they've identified the 2 best (other than TLAW) with getting to 3. I'd be surprised if they drafted Lance to an extent Quote Link to post Share on other sites
thebestever6 970 Posted Monday at 05:30 PM Share Posted Monday at 05:30 PM Lance is the biggest boom bust guy in this draft I always felt like he was the pick Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Xenos 1,152 Posted Monday at 10:05 PM Share Posted Monday at 10:05 PM 18 hours ago, 49erurtaza said: They did the same for Fields. Did they? I thought Beck deliberately set it up that way for Fields. In fact, he was trying to help Wilson, Fields, and Lance know all the movements and concepts of a Shanahan scheme since the teams 2-4 in the draft had someone who was versed in that scheme. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Forge 20,150 Posted Monday at 10:11 PM Share Posted Monday at 10:11 PM Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Jeezla 1,696 Posted Monday at 10:18 PM Share Posted Monday at 10:18 PM 2 minutes ago, Forge said: Everyone already knows Jerry Jones wants to move up to 6 for Pitts in case the Lions want him. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Forge 20,150 Posted Monday at 10:21 PM Share Posted Monday at 10:21 PM Just now, Jeezla said: Everyone already knows Jerry Jones wants to move up to 6 for Pitts in case the Lions want him. I was assuming that the Dolphins would be interested because they are thinking that they may have miscalculated on who would go at 4 & 5. I assumed when the made the trade originally that they believed Pitts or Chase would be there at 6 because a QB could go at 4, and Cincy was likely to take Sewell. Now the talk has shifted and it seems like those two could easily go 4 & 5 leaving Miami out in the cold. A move down with someone like Denver at 9 could make a ton of sense at that point if they aren't a big believer in Sewell or want to go another direction. Denver can go up and get a QB if they want and the cost wouldn't be an arm and a leg most likely. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Jeezla 1,696 Posted Monday at 10:29 PM Share Posted Monday at 10:29 PM (edited) 13 minutes ago, Forge said: I was assuming that the Dolphins would be interested because they are thinking that they may have miscalculated on who would go at 4 & 5. I assumed when the made the trade originally that they believed Pitts or Chase would be there at 6 because a QB could go at 4, and Cincy was likely to take Sewell. Now the talk has shifted and it seems like those two could easily go 4 & 5 leaving Miami out in the cold. A move down with someone like Denver at 9 could make a ton of sense at that point if they aren't a big believer in Sewell or want to go another direction. Denver can go up and get a QB if they want and the cost wouldn't be an arm and a leg most likely. That will probably still be the case if Trey Lance gives some GM a boner. The Giants should move up for him. I don't think they miscalculated #4, even if Pitts goes there. MIA is probably targeting Chase, and have since had assurances that Cinci is taking him at 5. Now they will target DeVonta/Waddle in a trade down, and pretend a reunion of Tua/Waddle or Smith was the plan all along, but they really wanted Ja'Marr. Maybe Sewell, but most likely Ja'Marr. Whoever the Bengals take at 5 is who the Dolphins wanted at 6. Edited Monday at 10:35 PM by Jeezla Quote Link to post Share on other sites
49erurtaza 2,401 Posted Monday at 11:03 PM Share Posted Monday at 11:03 PM 33 minutes ago, Jeezla said: That will probably still be the case if Trey Lance gives some GM a boner. The Giants should move up for him. I don't think they miscalculated #4, even if Pitts goes there. MIA is probably targeting Chase, and have since had assurances that Cinci is taking him at 5. Now they will target DeVonta/Waddle in a trade down, and pretend a reunion of Tua/Waddle or Smith was the plan all along, but they really wanted Ja'Marr. Maybe Sewell, but most likely Ja'Marr. Whoever the Bengals take at 5 is who the Dolphins wanted at 6. From my understanding they thought Bengals where taking Chase at 5 prior to the trade. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
N4L 4,055 Posted yesterday at 06:39 AM Share Posted yesterday at 06:39 AM 8 hours ago, Jeezla said: Everyone already knows Jerry Jones wants to move up to 6 for Pitts in case the Lions want him. Would the lions really take two TEs in the top 10 in three years?? I just can't buy that, although Pitts is certainly a better prospect than hockenson was. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jrry32 10,084 Posted yesterday at 06:52 AM Share Posted yesterday at 06:52 AM 12 minutes ago, N4L said: Would the lions really take two TEs in the top 10 in three years?? I just can't buy that, although Pitts is certainly a better prospect than hockenson was. Kyle Pitts isn't a TE. He's a unicorn. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.