NFL_Fan Posted April 5, 2021 Share Posted April 5, 2021 14 minutes ago, TL-TwoWinsAway said: Not to beat this poor, dying horse, but at what point does taking a swing at 189 make sense? It's one of those "home run" FFMD draft picks, in my opinion: if he works out in real life, it's an incredible pick. And we're certainly a good landing spot for him. im down since its ffmd why not (; Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karnage84 Posted April 5, 2021 Share Posted April 5, 2021 (edited) 19 minutes ago, TL-TwoWinsAway said: Not to beat this poor, dying horse, but at what point does taking a swing at 189 make sense? It's one of those "home run" FFMD draft picks, in my opinion: if he works out in real life, it's an incredible pick. And we're certainly a good landing spot for him. I think we should be looking at him with our next pick or just assume he won't be there for the pick after and work our plan around that. That is a pick that, if it hits, would be changing our back end. Edited April 5, 2021 by Karnage84 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NFL_Fan Posted April 5, 2021 Share Posted April 5, 2021 Just now, Karnage84 said: I think we should be looking at him with our next pick or just assume he won't be there for the pick after and work our plan around that. That is a pick that, if it hits, would be "BLANK". SHHHHHHHHH Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NFL_Fan Posted April 5, 2021 Share Posted April 5, 2021 packers looking to trade up 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TL-TwoWinsAway Posted April 5, 2021 Author Share Posted April 5, 2021 2 minutes ago, NFL_Fan said: packers looking to trade up PM sent their way. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karnage84 Posted April 5, 2021 Share Posted April 5, 2021 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TL-TwoWinsAway Posted April 5, 2021 Author Share Posted April 5, 2021 They're hoping for an earlier spot, but, if their target(s) are still available when our pick gets closer, they'll let us know. They have tons of ammo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karnage84 Posted April 5, 2021 Share Posted April 5, 2021 2 minutes ago, Karnage84 said: ^ Sleeping with the Enemy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TL-TwoWinsAway Posted April 5, 2021 Author Share Posted April 5, 2021 Just a reminder: our next pick is on the clock at 3:20 PM. I've been doing some work on 147. Looks like a solid player where we lack quite a bit of depth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TL-TwoWinsAway Posted April 5, 2021 Author Share Posted April 5, 2021 As intriguing as 98 is, the size is a huge concern. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TL-TwoWinsAway Posted April 5, 2021 Author Share Posted April 5, 2021 (edited) TRIPLE POST!!! Here's what I've been able to gather from this morning: Karnage: 37, 189, 26, 9 NFL_Fan: 147, 98, 189 Sllim: 119, 66, 98, 147 Trying to get an idea where we stand on things in advance. Edit: I put a twitter link into the google doc next to 189. He's the guy I really want here - a lot of what I'm reading has him being selected rounds earlier than the 4th - but I'll absolutely defer to the group on this. Edited April 5, 2021 by TL-TwoWinsAway Tripe edit on a triple post. I'm setting records over here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sllim Pickens Posted April 5, 2021 Share Posted April 5, 2021 66 is my top choice, probably 147 next and then 119. I dont love 189, but also havent done a lot of research on that group. Would be ok with it but I think the others fill more needs and improve the team more. I'd be ok with 189 if others are that high on him though given my ignorance. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TL-TwoWinsAway Posted April 5, 2021 Author Share Posted April 5, 2021 5 minutes ago, Sllim Pickens said: 66 is my top choice, probably 147 next and then 119. I dont love 189, but also havent done a lot of research on that group. Would be ok with it but I think the others fill more needs and improve the team more. I'd be ok with 189 if others are that high on him though given my ignorance. I'll have to go check 66 out. From what we've added at his position - and what we had already - I think we actually have a decent group. (Which, of course, "decent" is no justification to pass on a superior prospect.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sllim Pickens Posted April 5, 2021 Share Posted April 5, 2021 5 minutes ago, TL-TwoWinsAway said: I'll have to go check 66 out. From what we've added at his position - and what we had already - I think we actually have a decent group. (Which, of course, "decent" is no justification to pass on a superior prospect.) I agree we have improved the group, but do like the talent potential. That being said, I am not so strong towards any of those I mentioned that I would be opposed to go other directions. Just adding my .02. As I will admit I have not been up on late round research as much as other years. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sllim Pickens Posted April 5, 2021 Share Posted April 5, 2021 Also, do we get to add Corn Elder to our roster? Not that it really matters but that group looks so light on the depth chart. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.