Forge Posted April 6, 2021 Share Posted April 6, 2021 20 minutes ago, Blue said: I brought up the 40 because it's the first number people look at with athletic testing, not because it's the "end-all be-all." Suggesting Gesicki is an athlete on par with Pitts, who is rather widely regarded as one of the best tight end prospects since Vernon Davis, is ridiculous. And yet across the board he tested better or the same except in the 40 How highly regarded as a prospect he is is immaterial to athletic testing given that the ability to play football is a big part of that evaluation 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.