Jump to content

New Rule Change: Loosening Number Restrictions


Kiltman

Loosening Number Restrictions..  

54 members have voted

  1. 1. Into this?

    • Yes, mix things up.
      20
    • Yes, but think the new groups should be a little different.
      3
    • Meh, college already does it for the most part.
      8
    • No, hate it. Think of the history!
      23


Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Uncle Buck said:

I couldn't care less.  Let the players wear whatever number they want.  What's the big deal?  Fewer regulations is almost always a good thing.

Personnel packages could be impacted to an extent. It'll be slightly harder for opposing teams to determine which package you're sending out there. Not impossible but just slightly harder. I can see Belichick taking advantage of this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Tk3 said:

Let them wear whatever number they want

What would be wrong with a QB #47 or a DT #14 if they wanted to?

If the number is free on the team, let them wear it

I’m all in favor of this, except for OL still having to wear a designated ineligible number between 50-79.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/2/2021 at 4:09 PM, August4th said:

A RB/FB wearing numbers 80-89 and WR wearing 20-49 looks gross to me.

Cliff Branch, a Raider great that won three Superbowls, wore #21 and was a WR.

Edited by Trojan
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...