Cakeshoppe Posted December 24, 2017 Share Posted December 24, 2017 Right, there's a zero percent chance that Rodgers is released. Teams are probably somewhat justified in being annoyed that Rodgers gets a pass because he's Rodgers, even if they find other ways of doing effectively the same thing. GB gets a warning and worst case they take one of our 14 7th round picks this year. The league sends out a memo reminding teams about IR rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gopackgonerd Posted December 24, 2017 Share Posted December 24, 2017 13 minutes ago, Cakeshoppe said: Right, there's a zero percent chance that Rodgers is released. Teams are probably somewhat justified in being annoyed that Rodgers gets a pass because he's Rodgers, even if they find other ways of doing effectively the same thing. GB gets a warning and worst case they take one of our 14 7th round picks this year. The league sends out a memo reminding teams about IR rules. I mean he doesn't even need a pass, would it really be fair to the packers if they lost rodgers to something as silly as this.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted December 24, 2017 Share Posted December 24, 2017 53 minutes ago, Cakeshoppe said: Right, there's a zero percent chance that Rodgers is released. Teams are probably somewhat justified in being annoyed that Rodgers gets a pass because he's Rodgers, even if they find other ways of doing effectively the same thing. GB gets a warning and worst case they take one of our 14 7th round picks this year. The league sends out a memo reminding teams about IR rules. I mean, has anyone legitimately been punished for this rule ever? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pugger Posted December 25, 2017 Share Posted December 25, 2017 If indeed the league has to sign off on these transactions I'd love to know which teams made a stink about this. Talk about trolling! If I were Mark Murphy and I found out who these teams were I wouldn't be eager to be too cordial to them at the next league meeting, that's for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacReady Posted December 25, 2017 Author Share Posted December 25, 2017 45 minutes ago, Pugger said: If indeed the league has to sign off on these transactions I'd love to know which teams made a stink about this. Talk about trolling! If I were Mark Murphy and I found out who these teams were I wouldn't be eager to be too cordial to them at the next league meeting, that's for sure. Which teams tand the most to gain? The Browns. If I was John Dorsey, I would literally spend 24/7 whining and complaining and screaming and crying and moaning and bitching. Teams may very well be team, or it may just be the Browns, Vikings, Lions and Beats. I saw that I spelled Bears wrong but I'm not going back to correct it. Onward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted December 25, 2017 Share Posted December 25, 2017 On 12/24/2017 at 12:23 PM, Cakeshoppe said: Right, there's a zero percent chance that Rodgers is released. Teams are probably somewhat justified in being annoyed that Rodgers gets a pass because he's Rodgers, even if they find other ways of doing effectively the same thing. GB gets a warning and worst case they take one of our 14 7th round picks this year. The league sends out a memo reminding teams about IR rules. There is nothing to be warned about. The league approved the roster move. This is a complete non-issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketchup Posted December 25, 2017 Share Posted December 25, 2017 4 minutes ago, incognito_man said: There is nothing to be warned about. The league approved the roster move. This is a complete non-issue. Yep. Any fault lands on the league here for approving the roster move. GB won’t, and shouldn’t be, punished. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.