Leader Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 Just now, deltarich87 said: Ochocinco is on it, folks LOL. This is getting funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 47 minutes ago, broncostrings said: If you guys were to trade w/ sf....(not saying you will) would there be any chance you would draft a Qb? If Rodgers were to be dealt to SF, I would want a QB and try to move Love as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skibrett15 Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 1 minute ago, incognito_man said: you really want a season with a disgruntled Rodgers to ruin everything? Pass. Not sure where you're getting the need to restructure anyone else, either. if he's on the field he's gonna play to win, he's competitive. I misread the difference in his dead cap/current cap hit. I thought his 2021 hit was 27M and dead was 38, but it's only 37/38. Trading him costs 1.2M in cap space. So it's not that big of a deal, but it still costs money to trade him vs keep him. Which surely would be made up for by a bigger haul now than later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cheesehead430 Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 1 minute ago, Green19 said: Just like Ted with Favre Packers weren't a game away in back to back seasons when Ted drafted Rodgers. Big difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 1 minute ago, incognito_man said: i want a player that we get for Love that Rodgers would have loved, using assets acquired from Rodgers Got some vengeance in ya dont ya? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 Just now, skibrett15 said: if he's on the field he's gonna play to win, he's competitive. he's gonna play to maximize his own perceived value/legacy (which, history shows us, is not necessarily team-friendly). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NFLGURU Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 1 minute ago, Striker said: Source: His FIFA online opponent. Sf gave up all their top picks for pick # 3. They don't have the ammo for a Rodgers trade. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 Just now, Leader said: Got some vengeance in ya dont ya? more motivated by excitement over a refresh because I'm convinced we'll never win a SB with Rodgers again for a number of reasons. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skibrett15 Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 1 minute ago, incognito_man said: he's gonna play to maximize his own perceived value/legacy (which, history shows us, is not necessarily team-friendly). That sentence in the context of a single season means playing to win every game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hawkfan191 Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Penske Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 No worries Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deltarich87 Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 Just now, Hawkfan191 said: Pack trying to up that trade value Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 2 minutes ago, incognito_man said: more motivated by excitement over a refresh because I'm convinced we'll never win a SB with Rodgers again for a number of reasons. Okay. If nothing else, it certainly has changed the character of this draft day. More interested (probably for no good reason.......) now more than ever to see who we select tonight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 Just now, deltarich87 said: Pack trying to up that trade value Rapoport just wants to watch the world (Lambeau) burn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 32 minutes ago, PossibleCabbage said: So hypothetically, if SF moved up to 3 to make an offer for Rodgers, wouldn't you have rather had 12, 102, FRPs in 2022 and 2023 plus whatever would get added beyond #3 instead? Yup. GB has Love, so going to 3 to get another QB makes no sense. Would need to move Love for additional picks or players. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts