incognito_man Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 3 minutes ago, skibrett15 said: That sentence in the context of a single season means playing to win every game. no it doesn't i wrote it. I know what it means Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smetana34 Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 15 minutes ago, Jaire_Island said: 1) Trade him this year. 2) Aquire significant draft capital. 3) Absorb significant dead cap this year. 4) Tank this year. 5) Start afresh from next year. This is my thought too. But then you have to wonder what that says to guys like Alexander and Adams who we'd ideally like to retain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 Just now, squire12 said: Yup. GB has Love, so going to 3 to get another QB makes no sense. Would need to move Love for additional picks or players. or trade down from 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaire_Island Posted April 29, 2021 Author Share Posted April 29, 2021 Please remember SF doesn’t have a no 1 pick next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 Just now, smetana34 said: This is my thought too. But then you have to wonder what that says to guys like Alexander and Adams who we'd ideally like to retain probably the same thing it said to Charles Woodson and Greg Jennings in 2007 (their GB careers turned out ok) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 Watch us trade Love tonight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skibrett15 Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 1 minute ago, incognito_man said: no it doesn't i wrote it. I know what it means how could he possibly increase his legacy without winning games. By sitting out? By throwing games? By putting up empty stats? He's passed the stats threshold and he knows it. Only thing that matters for his legacy is rings. If he's not traded, he's going to play, and he's going to play well. It's really that simple 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 Just now, Jaire_Island said: Please remember SF doesn’t have a no 1 pick next year. nor do they in 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FinneasGage Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 Just now, packfanfb said: Watch us trade Love tonight. i pray Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 Just now, skibrett15 said: He's passed the stats threshold and he knows it. Only thing that matters for his legacy is rings. he doesn't appear to understand this. that's the elephant in the room... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green19 Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 5 minutes ago, Cheesehead430 said: Packers weren't a game away in back to back seasons when Ted drafted Rodgers. Big difference. Gute didn’t draft love after back to back. The went to one championship game... then drafted love. After of years of decline from Rodgers play, being difficult with the whole McCarthy issue, etc. Might not be the same but pretty much the same song and dance with a diva QB. Let’s all meet back in 15 years to deal with this same issue for Love. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beekay414 Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 Just now, FinneasGage said: i pray Don't be mad that Love is a better draft pick than anything the Magic have done in decades. 😉 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skibrett15 Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 2 minutes ago, incognito_man said: or trade down from 3 3 team trade is the only way I see this happening. Packers don't want a qb in the draft, but want a top pick plus more for rodgers which basically equals a qb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 Just now, skibrett15 said: 3 team trade is the only way I see this happening. Packers don't want a qb in the draft, but want a top pick plus more for rodgers which basically equals a qb yes, i had similar thoughts if it involves SF and GB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FinneasGage Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 1 minute ago, beekay414 said: Don't be mad that Love is a better draft pick than anything the Magic have done in decades. 😉 not wrong but dont wanna watch jameis for the next 3 years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts