Jump to content

Packers QB Aaron Rodgers disgruntled; "Does not want to return to team"


RaidersAreOne

Recommended Posts

Just now, squire12 said:

he going to hold that grudge against those decision makers as  well

Going to be funny seeing him replace pat sajak as the host of wheel of fortune instead. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, AZ_Eaglesfan said:

There is no way he actually believes the Packers FO is trying to sabotage his chances at winning a ring lol. This is a personal vendetta all based around one draft pick. It is petty and one would argue it likely hurts his chances at getting a ring going forward. 

Great to see other fans that actually get it. This is personal for Aaron, nothing to do with money or rings. He's got hurt feelings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ET80 said:

In Wisconsin, perhaps. Outside of Wisconsin, over with the Disney Sports Network? Unless Love is BETTER than Rodgers, it's the front and center question.

Yeah but ESPN isn't in our locker room, it's local media. The national guys will be there a week if Rodgers is gone, if it all. If he's still holding out? They'll be there all camp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, incognito_man said:

Who here would be happy if your employer paid you 40% more than they promised in half the amount of time?

I'd be ecstatic. I'd still be kind of pissed if they hired my replacement, though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, AkronsWitness said:

 

ESPN today had the Broncos offering two 1sts, Tim Patrick (WR2), Patrick Surtain Jr (CB2) and Drew Lock for Rodgers/Stokes

 

Not sure what Tim Patrick really adds.   WR are easy enough to find.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, squire12 said:

Not sure what Tim Patrick really adds.   WR are easy enough to find.  

Tim Patrick would step in from day 1 and be better than Allison, MVS, Lazard and St. Brown and whatever other mediocre WRs the Packers have been kicking around there for the last 5 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, AZ_Eaglesfan said:

lol....

It has nothing to do with what the team "needed", he is just mad that the Packers started looking towards a future without him... He is being a primadonna and taking everything the Packers FO does personally instead of realizing it is just business. 

Really ??? You think he's worried about Love ?? LMAO....and looking to the future instead of the present is somehow different ..OK, perspective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, AkronsWitness said:

Tim Patrick would step in from day 1 and be better than Allison, MVS, Lazard and St. Brown and whatever other mediocre WRs the Packers have been kicking around there for the last 5 years.

Tim Patrick is exactly the same caliber as MVS and Lazard, or worse. He'd be fighting for #4 snaps with Lazard and St. Brown behind Adams, MVS and Rodgers.

Allison isn't even on an NFL roster since 2019.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Cutler06 said:

Really ??? You think he's worried about Love ?? LMAO....and looking to the future instead of the present is somehow different ..OK, perspective.

You clearly don't know what you're talking about because you're arguing against someone who does.

This has nothing to do with rings or money...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, squire12 said:

Not sure what Tim Patrick really adds.   WR are easy enough to find.  

It is a good time to find WR's in the draft, but for that to happen, the Pack needs to start actually drafting them. 

(Yes, I know Rodgers got drafted - but that's IMO to say the Pack FO can say they were right when they said Rodgers was going to be on their team this year - they didn't specify which Rodgers - the joke writes itself).

Edited by Broncofan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Packerraymond said:

You clearly don't know what you're talking about because you're arguing against someone who does.

This has nothing to do with rings or money...

THen why is A-Rod bitchin' and wanting out so bad he's wants to do it publically ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, incognito_man said:

Tim Patrick is exactly the same caliber as MVS and Lazard, or worse. He'd be fighting for #4 snaps with Lazard and St. Brown behind Adams, MVS and Rodgers.

Allison isn't even on an NFL roster since 2019.

Tim Patrick had more 100+ yard receiving games than MVS, Lazard and St. Brown had last year.....combined. With Drew Lock and not Aaron Rodgers throwing him the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, AkronsWitness said:

Tim Patrick would step in from day 1 and be better than Allison, MVS, Lazard and St. Brown and whatever other mediocre WRs the Packers have been kicking around there for the last 5 years.

I dont know about that, theyve been in the league for 3 years lets look at their production

Tim Patrick: 

2018: 23 rec. 315 yds, 13.7 ypc., 1td

2019: 16 rec. 218 yds, 13.6 ypc, 0td

2020: 51 rec. 742 yds, 14.5 ypc, 6td

 

MVS
2018: 38 rec., 581 yds, 15.3 ypc, 2td

2019: 26 rec, 452 yds, 17.4 ypc, 2td

2020: 33 rec, 690 yds, 20.9 ypc, 6 td

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ifeelasleep said:

I dont know about that, theyve been in the league for 3 years lets look at their production

Tim Patrick: 

2018: 23 rec. 315 yds, 13.7 ypc., 1td

2019: 16 rec. 218 yds, 13.6 ypc, 0td

2020: 51 rec. 742 yds, 14.5 ypc, 6td

 

MVS
2018: 38 rec., 581 yds, 15.3 ypc, 2td

2019: 26 rec, 452 yds, 17.4 ypc, 2td

2020: 33 rec, 690 yds, 20.9 ypc, 6 td

 

Thats because Tim Patrick finally got a chance to start last year when Sutton went down. He was buried on the roster as a UDFA until then so looking at his stats from 2-3 years ago dont tell the story of how good he was once he got the snaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...