Leader Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 5 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: There's two firsts and the #9 pick in that package, along with another potential QB option in lieu of Love if it didn't work out. Who cares about Tim Patrick? He's not in there to move a needle. He's a 6'4 WR that ran in the 4.4s, why not toss him in? That package has possibilities going forward....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BroncoSojia Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 41 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: Great to see other fans that actually get it. This is personal for Aaron, nothing to do with money or rings. He's got hurt feelings. This is true, but in all honesty, I still want to see him traded because it can potentially benefit my team so 🤷🏾♂️ 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 4 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: There's two firsts and the #9 pick in that package, along with another potential QB option in lieu of Love if it didn't work out. Who cares about Tim Patrick? He's not in there to move a needle. He's a 6'4 WR that ran in the 4.4s, why not toss him in? I get that. The overall package is good. I don't have an issue with Patrick if that is the best that Denver would do. Not what I would want from GB end. the Surtain piece is with Stokes going to Denver. Good improvement as well. So a swap of 2021 first round picked players, 2022 1st, 2023 1st and some add ins with Lock and Patrick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 5 minutes ago, Leader said: That package has possibilities going forward....... TWSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 Just now, incognito_man said: TWSS To you? Doubt it 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 8 minutes ago, squire12 said: I get that. The overall package is good. I don't have an issue with Patrick if that is the best that Denver would do. Not what I would want from GB end. the Surtain piece is with Stokes going to Denver. Good improvement as well. So a swap of 2021 first round picked players, 2022 1st, 2023 1st and some add ins with Lock and Patrick Yeah I didn't see Stokes in there. Would not give him up. I'd do that package without Stokes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 1 minute ago, Packerraymond said: Yeah I didn't see Stokes in there. Would not give him up. I'd do that package without Stokes. Agree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 5 minutes ago, squire12 said: I get that. The overall package is good. I don't have an issue with Patrick if that is the best that Denver would do. Not what I would want from GB end. the Surtain piece is with Stokes going to Denver. Good improvement as well. So a swap of 2021 first round picked players, 2022 1st, 2023 1st and some add ins with Lock and Patrick It's close, the swap of Stokes and Surtain equals out to about an early 2nd in value. So it's close to 3 1sts. Lock and Patrick add nothing for me, so it's essential 3 1sts for Rodgers which is approaching what I'd feel ok about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 Where can I read this “package” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BroncoSojia Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 What about Chubb, Hamler, two firsts, and a second? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NudeTayne Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 12 minutes ago, BroncoSojia said: What about Chubb, Hamler, two firsts, and a second? You got yourself a deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 11 minutes ago, BroncoSojia said: What about Chubb, Hamler, two firsts, and a second? Hamler is of little interest. Chubb is later in his rookie deal, so less attractive Probably need better/younger players with those picks....since the future picks are going to be later in the round Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 14 minutes ago, Scoundrel said: Where can I read this “package” 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chiefs_5627 Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 😳 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chiefs_5627 Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 https://sports.theonion.com/it-s-him-or-me-says-unhinged-aaron-rodgers-demanding-1846829102 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts