Turnobili Posted May 22, 2021 Share Posted May 22, 2021 https://sports.yahoo.com/jaguars-forget-to-blur-out-draft-board-showing-a-wr-with-same-grade-as-trevor-lawrence-212532797.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
49ersfan Posted May 22, 2021 Share Posted May 22, 2021 Jags top 2 seem to be Trevor Lawrence & Jaylen Waddle The Colts had 2 blue cards visible in one of their draft videos, which is basically their elite player. Those were at pick 3 & 10, so Trey Lance & Devonta Smith Apparently the Falcons had 2 elite players in this draft...Trevor Lawrence & Kyle Pitts Always interesting to see how the different teams rank players. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tk3 Posted May 22, 2021 Share Posted May 22, 2021 Couple things.. 1. I know Waddle ended up going higher than originally expected - but if you truly view Waddle on the same level you view Lawrence, then they should have traded up to get him in a . They had the firepower to do so, and if you truly think he is THAT good, then you pair Lawrence/Waddle for a decade+ 2. How in the world are they still using a wall with stickers and tiny text? There are so many technology builds that would be so much better Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackstar12 Posted May 22, 2021 Share Posted May 22, 2021 Jags also gave Kwity Paye a 6.8 grade. 😏 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBURGE Posted May 22, 2021 Share Posted May 22, 2021 (edited) 36 minutes ago, Tk3 said: Couple things.. 1. I know Waddle ended up going higher than originally expected - but if you truly view Waddle on the same level you view Lawrence, then they should have traded up to get him in a . They had the firepower to do so, and if you truly think he is THAT good, then you pair Lawrence/Waddle for a decade+ 2. How in the world are they still using a wall with stickers and tiny text? There are so many technology builds that would be so much better We know they loved Toney, if he is a 7.5 on their system it would make sense to move up to 20ish to get him rather than move up to 5 or 6 to get Waddle. And who knows, maybe they did have a deal or deals in place to go get him at 12 if he dropped there Edited May 22, 2021 by JBURGE 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tk3 Posted May 22, 2021 Share Posted May 22, 2021 8 minutes ago, JBURGE said: We know they loved Toney, if he is a 7.5 on their system it would make sense to move up to 20ish to get him rather than move up to 5 or 6 to get Waddle. And who knows, maybe they did have a deal or deals in place to go get him at 12 if he dropped there you're probably right.. But if that's the case they needed to be more aggressive on Toney. If you love a guy that much, you make sure you get him. That's the entire purpose of having "extra" draft capital I'm just enamored with getting elite QB/WR combo out of the draft at the same time (or similar time) and riding that duo for a generation and let them grow together It's why I said the Bengals needed to draft Chase over Sewell, when otherwise Sewell was the "smarter" pick for them. Burrow/Chase can be one of those duos that retires together with decade+ careers and go to Canton together 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Posted May 23, 2021 Share Posted May 23, 2021 Caleb Farley with a 7.5. Nice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiltman Posted May 24, 2021 Share Posted May 24, 2021 I wish after x amount of years this stuff would be declassified like it is with the government. Like 25 years later, put out the draft boards. I just want to see where team's thought process was. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilenFroggen Posted May 24, 2021 Share Posted May 24, 2021 On 5/22/2021 at 10:29 AM, Tk3 said: 2. How in the world are they still using a wall with stickers and tiny text? There are so many technology builds that would be so much better Some people dig that analog. I just finished student teaching and my cooperating/mentor teacher likes attendance books and sticky notes and legal pads. She can use most of the Google apps, she just prefers it this way. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pwny Posted May 26, 2021 Share Posted May 26, 2021 On 5/22/2021 at 9:29 AM, Tk3 said: 1. I know Waddle ended up going higher than originally expected - but if you truly view Waddle on the same level you view Lawrence, then they should have traded up to get him in a . They had the firepower to do so, and if you truly think he is THAT good, then you pair Lawrence/Waddle for a decade+ The thing everyone is missing with these cards is in the lower left. They red marked Waddle’s medical. I’ve read concerns that he had ORIF surgery and that there might be questions that he will lose some of his agility even when he’s fully healed, if that’s a concern, you can’t spend all those assets to go up to get a guy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MWil23 Posted May 26, 2021 Share Posted May 26, 2021 On 5/24/2021 at 7:11 AM, EvilenFroggen said: Some people dig that analog. I just finished student teaching and my cooperating/mentor teacher likes attendance books and sticky notes and legal pads. She can use most of the Google apps, she just prefers it this way. Very true. It's funny (I'm a teacher and coach) because I use Google Classroom, sheets, forms, etc. every day with my students, but I still use a lot of manipulatives and other things as a coach. Hard copies with sheet formations, a hand chart, and small white board up in the box with our IPAD. I'll use the manipulatives while someone else plugs the data into the IPAD throughout the week and on game nights to see the trends and such. I also keep a hard copy attendance book along with the electronic one so that I can see the trends and seating chart with comments on it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gmen Posted May 26, 2021 Share Posted May 26, 2021 On 5/22/2021 at 11:19 AM, Tk3 said: you're probably right.. But if that's the case they needed to be more aggressive on Toney. If you love a guy that much, you make sure you get him. That's the entire purpose of having "extra" draft capital I don't think Toney was widely perceived to be a first round pick, so maybe they were expecting him to be available at their pick. Regardless, they misread the room. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeT14 Posted May 26, 2021 Share Posted May 26, 2021 18 minutes ago, Gmen said: I don't think Toney was widely perceived to be a first round pick, so maybe they were expecting him to be available at their pick. Regardless, they misread the room. Nah, there was plenty of talk of him going in the first to be fair. I don't remember seeing #20 often, but somewhere between 25-32, yes. Your bolded is a fair assumption. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pwny Posted May 26, 2021 Share Posted May 26, 2021 12 minutes ago, MikeT14 said: Nah, there was plenty of talk of him going in the first to be fair. I don't remember seeing #20 often, but somewhere between 25-32, yes. Your bolded is a fair assumption. Urban Meyer said after day one that there was a player that went right before them that they were heart broken to see go right before them. Then after day three, he admitted it was Toney. It sounds like they had Toney just a little above ETN for value in that slash role, maybe not even enough to justify a trade up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeT14 Posted May 26, 2021 Share Posted May 26, 2021 3 minutes ago, pwny said: Urban Meyer said after day one that there was a player that went right before them that they were heart broken to see go right before them. Then after day three, he admitted it was Toney. It sounds like they had Toney just a little above ETN for value in that slash role, maybe not even enough to justify a trade up. Yeah. Plenty of beat writers said they kept hearing Toney should go in the first. I wasn't too surprised when he went #20. And I know a lot of mockers had Toney going to the Jags (or another WR/TE). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.