SammyBradwater Posted October 25, 2017 Share Posted October 25, 2017 Obviously I'll be biased, but what a weird suspension... If Wallace had popped up, no flag and no one would've given the play a second thought, just like the people debating whether Barr's hit on Rodgers was dirty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kip Smithers Posted October 26, 2017 Share Posted October 26, 2017 22 hours ago, SammyBradwater said: Obviously I'll be biased, but what a weird suspension... If Wallace had popped up, no flag and no one would've given the play a second thought, just like the people debating whether Barr's hit on Rodgers was dirty. It's not bias, it's reasonable. The NFL are doing this to protect the bottom line. When it comes to player safety you can't trust them or listen to anything they say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthCountryEvo Posted October 30, 2017 Share Posted October 30, 2017 My biggest issue isn't the flag or even receiving a fine, it's the suspension. Sure, the validity of the flag could be considered debatable, but Sendejo isn't a dirty player or someone with much of a history. Yes, he did get fined for a hit earlier this year, but he's no Burfict. He isn't a hard hitter, and it seems like he was just playing to one of his strengths. Didn't look like he was trying to hit dirty, or that he was "targeting" Wallace, it was just a play that didn't result in the cleanest of hits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.