Jump to content

Week 1: VIKINGS (0-0) at Bengals (0-0)


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, SemperFeist said:

This team was not ready in the first half. It showed. And it cost them the game. 

However, running the ball for the sake of running the ball continues to be a problem with Mike Zimmer. 

Cook was ineffective the entire game, the passing offense was working in the 4th quarter and in overtime. They, once again, went away from what was working just to run “their brand”. 

Cook was effective in the 1st half. The Passing game, with this Oline, was 50/50 at best

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, twslhs20 said:

To be fair. It shouldn't have gone this far. Cincy was the better team. Not by much though.

Disagree. Vikings are the better team. I’ll fight that wasn’t a fumble. Called the other way and we don’t lose..:

 

but…::

 

our offensive line still lost us the game.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well...guys, on paper this should've been an easy, double digit win.  But, on grass, between the lines the Vikings stunk for 3 quarters. I think this team is just not as good as all the off season maneuvers indicated.

Now they can still turn it around, but the opponents only get more talented. It may be a long, sad season. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, gopherwrestler said:

Disagree. Vikings are the better team. I’ll fight that wasn’t a fumble. Called the other way and we don’t lose..:

 

but…::

 

our offensive line still lost us the game.

I never agree with blaming the refs. If the gamr is that close, you have no business winning. Just my 2 cents.

Probably wasn't a fumble, but we got outplayed

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know how we can see Cook's behind on the ground while the ball is still in his arm and not have that be Vikings ball. Not enough to overturn the call? The second his but touches the ground he's DOWN. That's enough.

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, twslhs20 said:

I never agree with blaming the refs. If the gamr is that close, you have no business winning. Just my 2 cents.

Probably wasn't a fumble, but we got outplayed

No business winning, but plenty of teams win with no business winning. I personally believe it was just the wrong call even ruling it a fumble. Refs are just thought to call it because of the review. 
 

No doubt were we outplayed but losing that way stings

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, gopherwrestler said:

No business winning, but plenty of teams win with no business winning. I personally believe it was just the wrong call even ruling it a fumble. Refs are just thought to call it because of the review. 
 

No doubt were we outplayed but losing that way stings

It wasn't even a big punch out. That shouldn't have been on the ground in the first place.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, gopherwrestler said:

No business winning, but plenty of teams win with no business winning. I personally believe it was just the wrong call even ruling it a fumble. Refs are just thought to call it because of the review. 
 

No doubt were we outplayed but losing that way stings

It isn't a great feeling.

It's a bad sign of things to come with competitive playoff teams.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Nzd07 said:

Pierce looked good. Tomlinson, not so much. Also didn’t hear Patrick Peterson’s name all day. He either got hurt or played really well haha

I kept seeing #7 which looked weird but I don't think they threw at him at all

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...