Jump to content

Week 1: Packers @ Saints in Jacksonville GDT


Recommended Posts

Just now, Rodjahs12 said:

Yeah except the defense went first and was already useless before the offense had its first drive but go on.

Except the first NO drive was 4 minutes and just a FG, after which the offense crapped the bed with a 7 play punt in the same 4 minutes, then a NO TD drive for 7 minutes, then the offense punting in 5 plays in 3 minutes. BUT THEY DIDNT HAVE THE BALL MAN

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Rodjahs12 said:

Jameis didnt have to do much but run on passes and hand the ball off so yeah it doesn't surprise me he looked good.

He's just way better than Rodgers

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, ThatJerkDave said:

But he didn't.  If I was just 6'9 I probably would have played in the NBA and been retired by now.

Dave played in college with Anthony Peeler and Doug Smith in this alternate universe.  They had a good squad.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy Herman -   The Packers felt they could fix their defensive issues with a new chef in the kitchen, rather than adding new ingredients. Outside of De'Vondre Campbell instead of Christian Kirksey - this is the exact same starting defense. So far, same results.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, thrILL! said:

That's 12's excuse?   Jameis Winston needed less than 5 mins to get going.  

You don't understand they unfairly assigned 22 minutes to winston and 8 to rodgers, there's nothing he could have done 

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, mikemike778 said:

Not sure what the point of this is.

The whole team is playing badly. Just like Rodgers aint getting anywhere without a supporting cast, the same applies to Jones.

Disgusting performance all round, but frankly Rodgers looked disinterested and pathetically unprepared. If this is his last dance, it was more Randy Wright than Michael Jordon like.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Leader said:

Andy Herman -   The Packers felt they could fix their defensive issues with a new chef in the kitchen, rather than adding new ingredients. Outside of De'Vondre Campbell instead of Christian Kirksey - this is the exact same starting defense. So far, same results.

Seems a lot worse to me

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Leader said:

Andy Herman -   The Packers felt they could fix their defensive issues with a new chef in the kitchen, rather than adding new ingredients. Outside of De'Vondre Campbell instead of Christian Kirksey - this is the exact same starting defense. So far, same results.

they replaced the wrong chef

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Leader said:

Andy Herman -   The Packers felt they could fix their defensive issues with a new chef in the kitchen, rather than adding new ingredients. Outside of De'Vondre Campbell instead of Christian Kirksey - this is the exact same starting defense. So far, same results.

well we did add stokes in R1.... but its hard to have a defense without LBs

Link to post
Share on other sites

How anyone could watch that first half and truly believe that it was the offenses fault that we had 2 possessions when the defense was giving up 5 and a half yards per play is beyond me but I'm going to just leave it at that and let whatever personal grudges ya'll have against Rodgers dictate this conversation as that's clearly what is you want to do lol. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...