rbens06 Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 On 11/11/2017 at 6:01 AM, jontat83 said: I wish we knew the exact situation in terms of money, but I saw some talk the Patriots could benefit cap wise in some way. I have no clue what happens with this, compensatory picks etc. Nice thing is since he was cut before week 10 was completed, Bennett will not count against us for compensatory reasons, so we should get more/better pick because of when we cut him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40Year Pack Fan Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 I doubt much is going to happen....Goodell has egg on his face from deflate-gate, and in negotiations for a new contract....$50 million/yr. plus personal jet use for life, and family insurance.....Since he already has Jerry Jones against him, he doesn't need to upset Robert Kraft any more than he already has.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacReady Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 Love Clinton-Dix for coming out and saying what everybody was thinking. He literally said that Bennett quit on us. Love it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kenrik Posted November 27, 2017 Share Posted November 27, 2017 Patriots place Marty on IR http://nfltraderumors.co/patriots-placing-te-martellus-bennett-injured-reserve/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lancerman Posted November 27, 2017 Share Posted November 27, 2017 29 minutes ago, Kenrik said: Patriots place Marty on IR http://nfltraderumors.co/patriots-placing-te-martellus-bennett-injured-reserve/ But he was lying about his injury tho? Lost his rights next year for next to no reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted November 27, 2017 Share Posted November 27, 2017 8 minutes ago, lancerman said: But he was lying about his injury tho? Lost his rights next year for next to no reason. We got Spriggs back, so we didn't need a swing OT anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted November 27, 2017 Share Posted November 27, 2017 12 minutes ago, lancerman said: But he was lying about his injury tho? Lost his rights next year for next to no reason. The reason was to take the trash out. Birds of the feather and all that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LargeFarva Posted November 27, 2017 Share Posted November 27, 2017 10 minutes ago, lancerman said: But he was lying about his injury tho? Lost his rights next year for next to no reason. The Packers cut him because he's a quitter and a loser and probably insufferable to be around with all of his ideological rhetoric. There's not a lot of info about the 'failure to disclose condition' designation, but I think it means the Packers will claim he sucked because he was hurt, and they gave him a fat contract expecting him not to suck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MNPackfan32 Posted November 27, 2017 Share Posted November 27, 2017 He played with it without a harness. He lied. Pretty simple. Maybe he actually got hurt for real this time? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted November 27, 2017 Share Posted November 27, 2017 4 minutes ago, MNPackfan32 said: He played with it without a harness. He lied. Pretty simple. Maybe he actually got hurt for real this time? Perhaps he either patted himself or his brother too hard on the back celebrating some invented success. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted November 27, 2017 Share Posted November 27, 2017 43 minutes ago, MNPackfan32 said: He played with it without a harness. He lied. Pretty simple. Maybe he actually got hurt for real this time? I don't get why they think this is vindication. He said he couldn't play. Then he did. What's complex here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LargeFarva Posted November 27, 2017 Share Posted November 27, 2017 35 minutes ago, MNPackfan32 said: He played with it without a harness. He lied. Pretty simple. Maybe he actually got hurt for real this time? Or maybe he actually got hurt playing for the Packers and the injury was related to a pre-existing condition that was missed or not acknowledged or not even tested for like arthritis or scar tissue or a hundred other things. Maybe that injury contributed to his poor play; it's a lot different trying to catch a pass when it hurts to lift up your arms. Maybe the Patriots signed him because they know about some obscure loop hole that would allow them to gain something from the Packers winning their case (like some of the signing bonus as was previous mentioned). Not so simple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted November 27, 2017 Share Posted November 27, 2017 18 minutes ago, LargeFarva said: Or maybe he actually got hurt playing for the Packers and the injury was related to a pre-existing condition that was missed or not acknowledged or not even tested for like arthritis or scar tissue or a hundred other things. Maybe that injury contributed to his poor play; it's a lot different trying to catch a pass when it hurts to lift up your arms. Maybe the Patriots signed him because they know about some obscure loop hole that would allow them to gain something from the Packers winning their case (like some of the signing bonus as was previous mentioned). Not so simple. Pats have nothing to do with SB money though. I do think he was hurt though. No doubt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LargeFarva Posted November 27, 2017 Share Posted November 27, 2017 5 minutes ago, NormSizedMidget said: Pats have nothing to do with SB money though. I'm 99% sure this is true, but then there's this guy: And if anyone would know about this it would be the Patriots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted November 28, 2017 Share Posted November 28, 2017 5 minutes ago, LargeFarva said: I'm 99% sure this is true, but then there's this guy: And if anyone would know about this it would be the Patriots. But SB money stays with the original team. That's what's confusing. Why would anyone get cap release on SB monies they never paid? If this is true, lol. God damn Patriots. We're supposed to have such a good relationship with them. It only makes sense if SB cap transferred. But it doesn't. Then again I'm always wrong about this ****. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.