Jump to content

Ben Albright to Drop Death Knell Emails for Hue & Coaches In the Morning?


Mind Character

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, Iamcanadian said:

I agree, drafting is really tough and you need a really skilled assessor of talent, to get the job done correctly. There is a solid reason why some teams remain competitive for years while others remain bottom feeders for decades and it can be found in 3 places. First, you need an owner who can assess FO talent and hires a talented one, then you need a talented FO that can assess prospects, FA's, HC's and scouts and drafts, signs or hires talented ones. Then you need a HC who can assess talent on hand and get rid of the junk on their rosters and help the GM to spot talented players to draft or sign as FA's. Unless, these 3 situations exist on a team, there is little hope they will ever be a consistent contender and are far more likely to be bottom feeders for years to come if not decades.

However, just to set the facts straight, Aaron Curry came out of one of the worst draft classes in the history of the draft, he was far from a sure thing, but teams really had few options in the early picks. They basically all stunk. Yes, he was considered a safe pick for a talentless draft, but in the end, it turned out to be exactly that, a talentless draft.

As for Weedon, he simply did not tick off all the boxes, which is why he fell to late round 1. QB's drafted where Weedon went, only have around a 6% chance for success, so clearly, a lot of boxes were not ticked on his chart. It was simply a desperate gamble that failed terribly.

Weeded was drafted 22nd because of age.  If he was coming out at 21 or 22 he goes top10. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MSURacerDT55 said:

Facts, there is no one that would have turned down physical freaks that dominated the game like Courtney Brown or Vernon Gholston. There was nothing in their medicals or interviews that would have suggested these guys would have been busts.

Which is exactly the driver behind the moneyball approach.

There are essentially two ways to improve your roster (via the draft) faster than your opponents.

1. Draft "hits" at a significantly higher rate, which doesn't really happen.  Statistically the best and worst GM"s hit on picks at a frequency within 10% of other. 

2. Draft more.  Accept the fact that every other guy you draft will suck and bring in more draft picks and with them, more hits.

The idea that we're gonna hire someone who's going to start hitting on 80% of these picks is a laughable myth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, sdrawkcab321 said:

here it is. Go ahead and say it’s fake and that he’s just a hater @Mind Character

 

By posting these in the first place, he revealed his source and undermined his journalistic power because when you're are a reporter, you report what you hear and cite sources thus giving your source plausible deniability.

You can publish leaked documents supporting your claims or emails that cannot be linked back to your source.

There are few coaches on the staff and it is easy to identify the source if Jimmy wants to really investigate this leak.

They can dig into Albright's background and discern who the likely Coach is with relationships to him, or they can easily use money to investigate via online via a private investigator.

That gives the FO the ability to fire the coach with cause and professional and college organizations do just this all the time.

----------------------------------

If you're a real reporter, you take the heat from skeptics and stand firm in your journalistic integrity...there's zero need to publish these emails....So what...now the twitter skeptics believe you now...

It was a terrible journalistic decision by Benjamin Albright as I stated in the OP...gives the coaches no plausible deniability and really ensures firing

Albright said on the cbs cleveland "I'm going to publish the emails because I don't local trolls talking bad about my name"...What??? Does he know what journalism is?

----------------------------------

If Jimmy has a coaches meeting, and asks who did this...someone either falls on their sword or lies to Jimmy giving him even more cause for firing.

If these emails aren't publish, the coaches could just say Albright is making it up.

It's a really terrible journalistic decision and really shows Albright is not secure in his reporting nor does he understand how these emails will further the goal of ownership firing the coaches.

Whoever the coach is...is foolish for doing this as well

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mistakey said:

that being said, he is asking for permission, so it doesnt really matter.  its almost like the coaches want to get fired

This South Park episode where they intentionally try to lose comes to mind instantly:

giphy.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...