PR Posted March 18, 2022 Share Posted March 18, 2022 43 minutes ago, Ragnarok said: His OL will be much better, run game will be as good, defense will be as good, ST much better. I think he will be more impressive cause he won't have a Davante caliber guy. His most consistent handed threat is now gone... receivers have to have the hands and the rest of the crew wasn't that 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnarok Posted March 18, 2022 Share Posted March 18, 2022 Berlin Trade Block Allen Robinson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Posted March 18, 2022 Share Posted March 18, 2022 MVS probably headed back to Green Bay. Packers can't really fit Robert Woods under the cap and still sign rookies but he's probably a trade option if they can tweak his cap number a bit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WFLukic Posted March 18, 2022 Share Posted March 18, 2022 Where's this cmd? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MWil23 Posted March 18, 2022 Share Posted March 18, 2022 Green Bay at 22 and 28. I smell at least one WR, maybe in a trade up even. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rackcs Posted March 18, 2022 Share Posted March 18, 2022 With the way wwhickok is trashing Rodgers, I assume that means he's going to trade for him next offseason 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted March 18, 2022 Share Posted March 18, 2022 3 minutes ago, rackcs said: With the way wwhickok is trashing Rodgers, I assume that means he's going to trade for him next offseason 0 chance that happens. I think you underestimate how I feel about Rodgers as a person. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rackcs Posted March 18, 2022 Share Posted March 18, 2022 1 minute ago, wwhickok said: 0 chance that happens. I think you underestimate how I feel about Rodgers as a person. It was a joke about Lamar 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted March 18, 2022 Share Posted March 18, 2022 1 minute ago, rackcs said: It was a joke about Lamar Oh I know haha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MWil23 Posted March 18, 2022 Share Posted March 18, 2022 For the record, I'm torn between the Browns trading Baker and watching him sulk and negotiate while "holding out" from a position of weakness with bad 2019 film, bad 2021 film, while being in the "Is he the next Jared Goff?" tier question entering 2023 with a loaded QB draft class and being 27 years old. Dunking on the Browns is fun, I totally get it. However, 50%+ of you were the same dudes dunking on the Browns for him being the QB to begin with, so which is it here? You can't have it both ways. Go ahead and dunk on the Browns for how they've handled this, but you folks said they should upgrade, and then when they try to, you mock them. Half of you: LMAO Browns go ahead and pay Baker and still irrelevant Also Half of you: LMAO Browns run Baker out of town who is the only QB you've had in 30 years to get you to relevance and fall back down in the cellar Also, hot take: The Browns denying Baker's trade request is a ploy to drive up his trade value since reports indicate thus far only 1 team has really shown interest (the Seahawks). They're going to wait for Watson to sign, and then they might have multiple teams interested in Baker vs. who they have on their roster/or other potentially disgruntled QB's (ATL/CAR/NO losers as well as Seattle and maybe INDY). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted March 18, 2022 Share Posted March 18, 2022 9 minutes ago, MWil23 said: For the record, I'm torn between the Browns trading Baker and watching him sulk and negotiate while "holding out" from a position of weakness with bad 2019 film, bad 2021 film, while being in the "Is he the next Jared Goff?" tier question entering 2023 with a loaded QB draft class and being 27 years old. Dunking on the Browns is fun, I totally get it. However, 50%+ of you were the same dudes dunking on the Browns for him being the QB to begin with, so which is it here? You can't have it both ways. Go ahead and dunk on the Browns for how they've handled this, but you folks said they should upgrade, and then when they try to, you mock them. Half of you: LMAO Browns go ahead and pay Baker and still irrelevant Also Half of you: LMAO Browns run Baker out of town who is the only QB you've had in 30 years to get you to relevance and fall back down in the cellar Also, hot take: The Browns denying Baker's trade request is a ploy to drive up his trade value since reports indicate thus far only 1 team has really shown interest (the Seahawks). They're going to wait for Watson to sign, and then they might have multiple teams interested in Baker vs. who they have on their roster/or other potentially disgruntled QB's (ATL/CAR/NO losers as well as Seattle and maybe INDY). Dang the people really in your head and feelings huh 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted March 18, 2022 Share Posted March 18, 2022 While I do think the Browns need to upgrade, they've completely mishandled the situation. Jim Haslam is a moron and that's the problem in Cleveland. On another note, according to a report, GB was willing to pay Adams the same contract Vegas gave him, however, Adams did not want to play in Green Bay any longer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rackcs Posted March 18, 2022 Share Posted March 18, 2022 2 minutes ago, wwhickok said: While I do think the Browns need to upgrade, they've completely mishandled the situation. Jim Haslam is a moron and that's the problem in Cleveland. On another note, according to a report, GB was willing to pay Adams the same contract Vegas gave him, however, Adams did not want to play in Green Bay any longer. From what I saw it was more of him wanting to play for the Raiders than not wanting to play for the Packers. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted March 18, 2022 Share Posted March 18, 2022 Just now, rackcs said: From what I saw it was more of him wanting to play for the Raiders than not wanting to play for the Packers. Possibly so. It just sounds as though, whatever happened between him and GB, that ship had sailed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MWil23 Posted March 18, 2022 Share Posted March 18, 2022 12 minutes ago, Scoundrel said: Dang the people really in your head and feelings huh This was supposed to go in NFL Gen and I posted it in the wrong forum. LOL 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.