ochocinco4pres Posted February 21, 2022 Share Posted February 21, 2022 I don't see the Bengals making that trade as they don't trade up in drafts. I mean if they are going to be aggressive I love the idea of Neal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Who-dey Posted February 21, 2022 Share Posted February 21, 2022 I love the aggressive approach for the Bengals. Would rather see them spend 20 mil on Armstead and keep the pics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iloxygenil Posted February 21, 2022 Share Posted February 21, 2022 For a Falcons roster that is devoid of talent, leaving the first two rounds with only 1 potential impact player this draft would make the falcons worse than better. I am not saying I know everything but this feels so far outside the lines for the Falcons. Gardner instead of Dean for sure and then we have to fix the line of scrimmage. Falcons are better off being bad and shooting for a QB next year than taking Willis in rd 2 when Ryan isn’t leaving. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sllim Pickens Posted February 22, 2022 Share Posted February 22, 2022 This would be a travesty for Detroit. We are short on meaningful picks so sending a 3rd to move up for a CB after taking a S would be foolish. Our CBs actually weren't awful last year and we will get Okudah back. We definitely could and should add one, but definitely not trade up for one. Sit tight and draft Burks and then grab Pitre in the second. I love Kyle Hamilton but I doubt we could take him over the edge guys. I wouldn't hate it but would be very skeptical about a safety going top 2. If we trade down a few picks I'd be ok with it. Chenal is another guy I like but not at the top of the 2nd. His numbers at the combine will determine where he goes so if he runs well, I could see him there at the top of the second but as of now I dont think he is worth that pick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason_Bengal_Fl Posted February 24, 2022 Share Posted February 24, 2022 I love that for the Bengals, but I guarantee you they would never do that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nabbs4u Posted February 26, 2022 Share Posted February 26, 2022 If all it took was 15/16 to move up to #3 for Hutchinson I'd be ecstatic. Eagles somehow get the chance to add Suace at #19 as well? I'd need new Jorts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappaz Posted February 27, 2022 Share Posted February 27, 2022 For the Chargers I dont hate the players picked but one of those picks needs to be defensive help. Chargers really need a DT, CB, and edge. Their offense was very good last year but the defense cost them many games and MUST be upgraded heavily. I'd assume if they went London at 17 they must have let Mike Williams walk in FA. TE is a need but one I think they end up going with another stop gap FA with since they used a 3rd last year on a TE and have Parham who is a pretty good receiving TE. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr LBC Posted February 27, 2022 Share Posted February 27, 2022 5 hours ago, Zappaz said: For the Chargers I dont hate the players picked but one of those picks needs to be defensive help. Chargers really need a DT, CB, and edge. Their offense was very good last year but the defense cost them many games and MUST be upgraded heavily. I'd assume if they went London at 17 they must have let Mike Williams walk in FA. TE is a need but one I think they end up going with another stop gap FA with since they used a 3rd last year on a TE and have Parham who is a pretty good receiving TE. If Lombardi had a notable influence on the draft strategy last year - and where John-boy and Telesco are concerned, I can't be sure - then the investment in McKitty is... interesting. I don't know that it's telling, but New Orleans brought in a new TE practically every season with Lombardi on staff even when they had Jimmy Graham perennially going to Pro Bowls thanks to Brees. As a rule, of thumb, I generally loathe the "let someone walk in FA only to turn around and draft their replacement" approach... but that hasn't stopped the Spanesco pair from taking it in the past, from what I recall. Short of possibly going for a value pick (and I'm not even sure he last to the Chargers' natural pick there on Day 2) in George Pickens, I'm not sure I see a WR who is going to be available to them who really has more of an immediate impact on Herbert than any FA does. Replacing Williams with Drake seems a bit too like-for-like to really be actual value. Honest opinion, and I wouldn't guarantee Spanesco would have this much sense (especially two years running), but the Chargers would get more immediate spin out of Penning (to replace Bulaga at ROT and lock both tackle spots down for the foreseeable future) or Sauce Gardner, who gives you guys an amazing amount of flexibility (depth chart wise and cap-wise moving forward, because he could realistically make Chris Harris expendable) even if he's not going into an immaculate scheme-fit going from Cincinnati's scheme to Staley's, though I'm willing to bet on both Staley and Pleasant's ability to adapt to fit the talent presented here. Plus, if he is able to replicate the kind of success he had in college, it does amazing things for what Asante Samuel Jr. is capable of doing in Staley's scheme. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Louis Friend Posted February 27, 2022 Share Posted February 27, 2022 I don't mind the Hamilton pick at #2 for Detroit. but you lost me after that. Detroit has no reason to move up in the first for a CB They have muliple young CBs for Aubrey Pleasant to develop. If anything, Detroit should be moving back for more picks. Even if they stay at #32, WR Treylon Burks should be their top target in that situation. Then you have them reaching for a LB who is hardly BPA at #34. I can understand trying to take as different approach to these mocks. They get redundant after awhile. But these moves make no sense for the team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cutler06 Posted February 27, 2022 Share Posted February 27, 2022 Cincinnati received: 2022 #9 overallDenver received: 2022 #31 overall, 2022 3rd round; 2023 1st and 3rd round picks Feels like this is weighed heavily towards the Bengals, moving up from essentially a 2nd to a top 10 pick should be worth more than 2 late 3rd (almost 4ths) and a 1st. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sparky151 Posted February 27, 2022 Share Posted February 27, 2022 2 hours ago, Cutler06 said: Cincinnati received: 2022 #9 overallDenver received: 2022 #31 overall, 2022 3rd round; 2023 1st and 3rd round picks Feels like this is weighed heavily towards the Bengals, moving up from essentially a 2nd to a top 10 pick should be worth more than 2 late 3rd (almost 4ths) and a 1st. Well, the Bengals wouldn't make that trade anyway so it doesn't matter. They wouldn't trade 2 1s and 2 3s for a RT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cutler06 Posted February 27, 2022 Share Posted February 27, 2022 29 minutes ago, sparky151 said: Well, the Bengals wouldn't make that trade anyway so it doesn't matter. They wouldn't trade 2 1s and 2 3s for a RT. Realistically, this is closer in value to 2 2nds and 2 4th, so it is MOOT. However, trading low round picks (late in those rounds) to protect Burrows for the next decade by drafting Neal would not ne a terrible idea, but I agree CIN wouldn't do it either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sparky151 Posted February 28, 2022 Share Posted February 28, 2022 Yeah, they could get a known commodity, a proven pro-bowler for less than that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Posted February 28, 2022 Share Posted February 28, 2022 (edited) Titans aren’t taking a CB, at least not early on. Spent a first, second, and third at that position in the last two years. WR or OL most likely there. Edge if they can’t re-sign Landry. Edited February 28, 2022 by Daniel Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedGold Posted March 1, 2022 Share Posted March 1, 2022 Would take this for KC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.