Jump to content

Who's higher on your all time list: Lawrence Taylor or Jerry Rice?


mdonnelly21

Who's higher on your all time list: Lawrence Taylor or Jerry Rice?   

36 members have voted

  1. 1. Who's higher on your all time list: Lawrence Taylor or Jerry Rice?

    • Jerry Rice
      26
    • Lawrence Taylor
      10


Recommended Posts

Taylor. It's much harder for a player to stand out at his position and he quite literally changed football. 

I'll make it really simple. As good as Rice was, when he was on the 49'ers that team belonged to Montana and then Young. Nobody in their right mind would ever say Rice was more important than either of them. 

Taylor was the only defensive player ever on a multi Super Bowl winning team where the consensus was "this guy is far and away the face of the team and the most important guy on the field bar none". That was his team. 

As good as Rice was, and he was amazing, if you are building a team and you have to choose between either one of those, Taylor adds far more.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/25/2022 at 8:20 PM, FrantikRam said:

Rice did things WRs are barely doing today in a time that was harder for offenses.

Lawrence Taylor did things that we do see fairly frequently today in an era where it's harder to play defense.

Rice also happened to hit at the right time when the WCO was taking advantage of older defenses built to do different things. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, biggie. said:

I'd take LT every time; more valuable position.

To even get to a point where you can consider LT, you have to answer the questions:

Am I weighing the positional impact?

Do I care at all about Longevity?

Do I care at all about the locker room or off the field drama?

How much am I taking away from Rice for playing with Montana/Walsh?

If the answers aren't: Yes, No, No, Quite a Bit, it's basically impossible to get to the idea of LT. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, AlexGreen#20 said:

To even get to a point where you can consider LT, you have to answer the questions:

Am I weighing the positional impact?

Do I care at all about Longevity?

Do I care at all about the locker room or off the field drama?

How much am I taking away from Rice for playing with Montana/Walsh?

If the answers aren't: Yes, No, No, Quite a Bit, it's basically impossible to get to the idea of LT. 

Huh? There are atleast 2 or 3 WR’s that you could argue talent for talent were on par with Rice or even better at their peak. There really isn’t anybody like that for LT. 
 

The basically comes down to whether you care THAT much about longevity. Which again is pretty bad considering one guy plays a far less physically demanding position. 
 

Rice’s teams did and could win SB’s without him (in fact the worst 49’ers drought of the Montana era occurred when he first was drafted), those Giants teams don’t win without LT. He’s the one guy you can say that based on pure skill as a defensive player approached a QB’s impact. 

Edited by lancerman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/27/2022 at 1:16 PM, biggie. said:

I'd take LT every time; more valuable position.

If you look at Super Bowl participating teams, WR has gone from one of the least important positions in the league, like Bottom 4-5, to Top 3 over the past five years. Right behind QB and EDGE. So the gap is closing. Also, could Lawrence cover? As a 3-4 EDGE in today’s NFL, you need to be able to cover.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are both 100 out of 100.

 

I will go Rice because he has no Reggie White equivalent at his level.

He also played longer and won more.

 

Its weird if you applied today's rules because both would be suspended for drugs (LT) and cheating (Rice)

LT sending prostitutes to the hotel rooms of opposing players would be an interesting 2021 scandal.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...