Jump to content

Steelers re-sign S Terrell Edmunds to a 1 year deal


TheRealMcCoy

Recommended Posts

He is servicable.   Definitely not the biggest issue on defense.   Not the long term answer, but 1 year for 2.5 is worth it, especially with so many needs.

Now, watch us blow our first rounder on one of these bum QBs...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, 43M said:

He is servicable.   Definitely not the biggest issue on defense.   Not the long term answer, but 1 year for 2.5 is worth it, especially with so many needs.

Now, watch us blow our first rounder on one of these bum QBs...

Blow two first rounders trading up from 20 to 12 with the Vikings*

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's about the definition of an average starter. He's fast, tackles fairly well, is rarely egregiously out of position. I doubt his re-signing majorly changes the Steelers draft plans, but keeps us from having a glaring hole in the starting lineup. $2.5M is a drop in the bucket. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, MOSteelers56 said:

He's about the definition of an average starter. He's fast, tackles fairly well, is rarely egregiously out of position. I doubt his re-signing majorly changes the Steelers draft plans, but keeps us from having a glaring hole in the starting lineup. $2.5M is a drop in the bucket. 

...is he average? I was under the impression he was pretty bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TheKillerNacho said:

...is he average? I was under the impression he was pretty bad.

Meh, he covers TEs alright, and he’s crazy fast. He’s not a net negative. He’s just not a game changer. I think some fans have had an extremely negative view of him because he was such a reach.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MOSteelers56 said:

I think he’s seen as bad because he was a 1st rounder. He covers TEs alright, and he’s crazy fast. He’s not a net negative. He’s just not a game changer. I think some fans have had an extremely negative view of him because he was such a reach.

that's fair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...