Jump to content

Pick 2 - #51 overall - IOL Cam Jurgens


Kiltman

Recommended Posts

Like I said in the other thread.... if Stout wanted him I am 100% all for it. Kelce is gone next year and Landon is becoming really good at guard, Jurgens at Center going forward will be important for us. If he can cross train at guard and get backup snaps there even better.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AZ_Eaglesfan said:

Like I said in the other thread.... if Stout wanted him I am 100% all for it. Kelce is gone next year and Landon is becoming really good at guard, Jurgens at Center going forward will be important for us. If he can cross train at guard and get backup snaps there even better.

We aren't a team in a position to take luxury iOL picks.

 

We are a bad team.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ninjapirate said:

We aren't a team in a position to take luxury iOL picks.

 

We are a bad team.

Doesn't matter. One second rounder isn't going to make us a good team if we are bad. 

We preach BPA and then our FO sticks to the board and half the fans panic when we don't fill holes in rounds one and two. It's really odd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AZ_Eaglesfan said:

Doesn't matter. One second rounder isn't going to make us a good team if we are bad. 

We preach BPA and then our FO sticks to the board and half the fans panic when we don't fill holes in rounds one and two. It's really odd.

I dont think he was BPA. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ninjapirate said:

Even then is he that big of an upgrade over Isaac or Driscoll?

Dunno, but both are on one year deals. If he can do G then they are good no matter how long Kelce wants to go.

Just trying to look at the logic. I mean if you know Kelce is done after this year that’s enough reason if you think he will be able to fill those shoes year 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Kiltman said:

Dunno, but both are on one year deals. If he can do G then they are good no matter how long Kelce wants to go.

Just trying to look at the logic. I mean if you know Kelce is done after this year that’s enough reason if you think he will be able to fill those shoes year 2.

Trading for AJ brown and then taking a back up center in roudn 2 are two very different philosophies that make no sense when they are back to back moves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...