Dashing202 Posted December 25, 2017 Share Posted December 25, 2017 I'll give gruden another year I was frustrated due to some loses but out of his defense he didn't have the D collapse at half time etc and he lost his OC along with two WR. 8-8/7-9 is pretty good considering how hard our schedule was . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ripsean21 Posted December 25, 2017 Share Posted December 25, 2017 His job shouldn’t even be in question with all the turnover and all the injuries as long as the team is competeing and standing together. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woz Posted December 30, 2017 Share Posted December 30, 2017 On 12/19/2017 at 11:59 AM, Slateman said: I say the VIkings because that should have been a very winnable game. It's when the defense finally couldn't take it any more and just couldn't keep Keenum from lighting it up. It was obvious the team just simply didn't care after that and Manusky didn't know how to scheme. He might be a good position coach and good at getting people coached up to plays, but he simply can't make the adjustments needed at the DC level. I was talking mathematically. While they could have (and probably should have) beaten the Vikings, they could have absorbed that loss had they beaten the Saints and Cowboys. Once they lost to the Saints, the number of pathways to the playoffs became incredibly small and was for all intents and purposes closed when they lost to the Cowboys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.