Jump to content

Nacho Simulation Football League (Season 24 - Taco Bowl XXIV POSTED!)


Recommended Posts

Decided to do my own set of ratings.. Used an impartial source to "grade" players - although some of the grades I don't trust, in general it gives an impartial grading system. Then I put forward a formula to weight positional importance

Overall rankings

  1. 87.9 Royals
  2. 87.1 Puppets
  3. 85.9 Papermakers
  4. 85.5 Rattlers
  5. 85.4 Squirrels
  6. 85.3 Direwolves
  7. 85.3 Pirates
  8. 85.3 Predators
  9. 85.0 Kongs
  10. 84.8 Samurai
  11. 84.1 Venom
  12. 83.8 Starfall
  13. 82.5 Ukpiks
  14. 82.2 Blobfish
  15. 82.1 Walruses
  16. 82.0 Amish
  17. 81.7 Bighorns
  18. 80.8 Thunder
  19. 79.9 Orcas
  20. 79.6 Polar Bears (rip, twins)

Offensive Rankings

  1. 89.1 Puppets
  2. 89.0 Pirates
  3. 88.9 Royals
  4. 86.9 Papermakers
  5. 86.7 Squirrels
  6. 86.3 Rattlers
  7. 86.2 Direwolves
  8. 85.8 Venom
  9. 85.7 Kongs
  10. 85.6 Predators
  11. 85.0 Ukpiks
  12. 84.9 Walruses
  13. 83.8 Samurai
  14. 82.9 Starfall
  15. 82.5 Bighorns
  16. 81.6 Blobfish
  17. 81.4 Amish
  18. 81.0 Polar Bears
  19. 79.7 Orcas
  20. 79.1 Thunder

Defensive Rankings

  1. 86.8 Royals
  2. 86.0 Samurai
  3. 84.9 Predators
  4. 84.8 Puppets
  5. 84.7 Starfall
  6. 84.7 Papermakers
  7. 84.6 Rattlers
  8. 84.3 Kongs
  9. 84.3 Direwolves
  10. 83.9 Squirrels
  11. 82.9 Blobfish
  12. 82.7 Thunder
  13. 82.6 Amish
  14. 82.1 Venom
  15. 81.1 Pirates
  16. 80.8 Bighorns
  17. 80.3 Orcas
  18. 79.6 Ukpiks
  19. 78.9 Walruses
  20. 78.0 Polar Bears

 

I think this listing undersells the Kong and Venom a little bit, but there it is

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Tk3 said:

Decided to do my own set of ratings.. Used an impartial source to "grade" players - although some of the grades I don't trust, in general it gives an impartial grading system. Then I put forward a formula to weight positional importance

Overall rankings

  1. 87.9 Royals
  2. 87.1 Puppets
  3. 85.9 Papermakers
  4. 85.5 Rattlers
  5. 85.4 Squirrels
  6. 85.3 Direwolves
  7. 85.3 Pirates
  8. 85.3 Predators
  9. 85.0 Kongs
  10. 84.8 Samurai
  11. 84.1 Venom
  12. 83.8 Starfall
  13. 82.5 Ukpiks
  14. 82.2 Blobfish
  15. 82.1 Walruses
  16. 82.0 Amish
  17. 81.7 Bighorns
  18. 80.8 Thunder
  19. 79.9 Orcas
  20. 79.6 Polar Bears (rip, twins)

Offensive Rankings

  1. 89.1 Puppets
  2. 89.0 Pirates
  3. 88.9 Royals
  4. 86.9 Papermakers
  5. 86.7 Squirrels
  6. 86.3 Rattlers
  7. 86.2 Direwolves
  8. 85.8 Venom
  9. 85.7 Kongs
  10. 85.6 Predators
  11. 85.0 Ukpiks
  12. 84.9 Walruses
  13. 83.8 Samurai
  14. 82.9 Starfall
  15. 82.5 Bighorns
  16. 81.6 Blobfish
  17. 81.4 Amish
  18. 81.0 Polar Bears
  19. 79.7 Orcas
  20. 79.1 Thunder

Defensive Rankings

  1. 86.8 Royals
  2. 86.0 Samurai
  3. 84.9 Predators
  4. 84.8 Puppets
  5. 84.7 Starfall
  6. 84.7 Papermakers
  7. 84.6 Rattlers
  8. 84.3 Kongs
  9. 84.3 Direwolves
  10. 83.9 Squirrels
  11. 82.9 Blobfish
  12. 82.7 Thunder
  13. 82.6 Amish
  14. 82.1 Venom
  15. 81.1 Pirates
  16. 80.8 Bighorns
  17. 80.3 Orcas
  18. 79.6 Ukpiks
  19. 78.9 Walruses
  20. 78.0 Polar Bears

 

I think this listing undersells the Kong and Venom a little bit, but there it is

Lower the QB importance. Higher importance for championships than seasonal wins imo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Tk3 said:

Decided to do my own set of ratings.. Used an impartial source to "grade" players - although some of the grades I don't trust, in general it gives an impartial grading system. Then I put forward a formula to weight positional importance

Overall rankings

  1. 87.9 Royals
  2. 87.1 Puppets
  3. 85.9 Papermakers
  4. 85.5 Rattlers
  5. 85.4 Squirrels
  6. 85.3 Direwolves
  7. 85.3 Pirates
  8. 85.3 Predators
  9. 85.0 Kongs
  10. 84.8 Samurai
  11. 84.1 Venom
  12. 83.8 Starfall
  13. 82.5 Ukpiks
  14. 82.2 Blobfish
  15. 82.1 Walruses
  16. 82.0 Amish
  17. 81.7 Bighorns
  18. 80.8 Thunder
  19. 79.9 Orcas
  20. 79.6 Polar Bears (rip, twins)

Offensive Rankings

  1. 89.1 Puppets
  2. 89.0 Pirates
  3. 88.9 Royals
  4. 86.9 Papermakers
  5. 86.7 Squirrels
  6. 86.3 Rattlers
  7. 86.2 Direwolves
  8. 85.8 Venom
  9. 85.7 Kongs
  10. 85.6 Predators
  11. 85.0 Ukpiks
  12. 84.9 Walruses
  13. 83.8 Samurai
  14. 82.9 Starfall
  15. 82.5 Bighorns
  16. 81.6 Blobfish
  17. 81.4 Amish
  18. 81.0 Polar Bears
  19. 79.7 Orcas
  20. 79.1 Thunder

Defensive Rankings

  1. 86.8 Royals
  2. 86.0 Samurai
  3. 84.9 Predators
  4. 84.8 Puppets
  5. 84.7 Starfall
  6. 84.7 Papermakers
  7. 84.6 Rattlers
  8. 84.3 Kongs
  9. 84.3 Direwolves
  10. 83.9 Squirrels
  11. 82.9 Blobfish
  12. 82.7 Thunder
  13. 82.6 Amish
  14. 82.1 Venom
  15. 81.1 Pirates
  16. 80.8 Bighorns
  17. 80.3 Orcas
  18. 79.6 Ukpiks
  19. 78.9 Walruses
  20. 78.0 Polar Bears

 

I think this listing undersells the Kong and Venom a little bit, but there it is

Number one?

Will Ferrell Reaction GIF

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Tk3 said:

Decided to do my own set of ratings.. Used an impartial source to "grade" players - although some of the grades I don't trust, in general it gives an impartial grading system. Then I put forward a formula to weight positional importance

Overall rankings

  1. 87.9 Royals
  2. 87.1 Puppets
  3. 85.9 Papermakers
  4. 85.5 Rattlers
  5. 85.4 Squirrels
  6. 85.3 Direwolves
  7. 85.3 Pirates
  8. 85.3 Predators
  9. 85.0 Kongs
  10. 84.8 Samurai
  11. 84.1 Venom
  12. 83.8 Starfall
  13. 82.5 Ukpiks
  14. 82.2 Blobfish
  15. 82.1 Walruses
  16. 82.0 Amish
  17. 81.7 Bighorns
  18. 80.8 Thunder
  19. 79.9 Orcas
  20. 79.6 Polar Bears (rip, twins)

Offensive Rankings

  1. 89.1 Puppets
  2. 89.0 Pirates
  3. 88.9 Royals
  4. 86.9 Papermakers
  5. 86.7 Squirrels
  6. 86.3 Rattlers
  7. 86.2 Direwolves
  8. 85.8 Venom
  9. 85.7 Kongs
  10. 85.6 Predators
  11. 85.0 Ukpiks
  12. 84.9 Walruses
  13. 83.8 Samurai
  14. 82.9 Starfall
  15. 82.5 Bighorns
  16. 81.6 Blobfish
  17. 81.4 Amish
  18. 81.0 Polar Bears
  19. 79.7 Orcas
  20. 79.1 Thunder

Defensive Rankings

  1. 86.8 Royals
  2. 86.0 Samurai
  3. 84.9 Predators
  4. 84.8 Puppets
  5. 84.7 Starfall
  6. 84.7 Papermakers
  7. 84.6 Rattlers
  8. 84.3 Kongs
  9. 84.3 Direwolves
  10. 83.9 Squirrels
  11. 82.9 Blobfish
  12. 82.7 Thunder
  13. 82.6 Amish
  14. 82.1 Venom
  15. 81.1 Pirates
  16. 80.8 Bighorns
  17. 80.3 Orcas
  18. 79.6 Ukpiks
  19. 78.9 Walruses
  20. 78.0 Polar Bears

 

I think this listing undersells the Kong and Venom a little bit, but there it is

I made the top 17!!!

Happy Black Girl GIF by Nick At Nite

Edited by RTTRUTH
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, The Orca said:

Lower the QB importance. Higher importance for championships than seasonal wins imo

yeah, I have QB importance quite high. QB makes up ~20% of the offensive grade and ~10% of the overall grade

Feels about right to me, but I get the argument that its too high for a single player

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Glen said:

Number one?

Will Ferrell Reaction GIF

You have a star QB, you have by FAR the most players 90+ (10, and 2nd most is Puppets with 7), you are tied with Rattlers for most players 80+ (20), and you are the only team with nobody rated under 75

The source I used loves your team lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Tk3 said:

You have a star QB, you have by FAR the most players 90+ (10, and 2nd most is Puppets with 7), you are tied with Rattlers for most players 80+ (20), and you are the only team with nobody rated under 75

The source I used loves your team lol

I love your source

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...