Norm Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 5 minutes ago, incognito_man said: hm, let's do some detective work. You're using preseason! I knew it!! It's so sad I want to win the SB this year not because I want to. Only to make fun of all that people with personality complexes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted November 15, 2017 Author Share Posted November 15, 2017 removing defensive stats: Bellichick is .474 w/o Brady McCarthy is .585 w/o Rodgers career. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 5 minutes ago, incognito_man said: removing defensive stats: Bellichick is .474 w/o Brady McCarthy is .585 w/o Rodgers career. This includes the browns and Favre you sneaky bastard. (Just helping the slow people) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted November 15, 2017 Author Share Posted November 15, 2017 Just now, NormSizedMidget said: This includes the browns you sneaky bastard. i don't cherry pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 2 minutes ago, incognito_man said: i don't cherry pick. Honesty ftw. McCarthy is winless when I decide certain things and stuff. So is Ted and Ernest. Fire them all Nobody else can do this in reverse though!!!!!! Grrrr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoellPreston88 Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 9 hours ago, packerrfan74 said: Well this looks like a trainwreck in the making Lmao OP thought he was making a point, this might be the worst thread ever. He should be embarrassed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted November 15, 2017 Author Share Posted November 15, 2017 45 minutes ago, RoellPreston88 said: Lmao OP thought he was making a point, this might be the worst thread ever. He should be embarrassed u mad cuz u got schooled, son Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pollino14 Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 What is the point that's trying to be portrayed here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted November 15, 2017 Author Share Posted November 15, 2017 16 minutes ago, pollino14 said: What is the point that's trying to be portrayed here? That MM is a fantastic coach whose career is off to a WAY better start than belichicks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pollino14 Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 1 hour ago, incognito_man said: That MM is a fantastic coach whose career is off to a WAY better start than belichicks. Ya man! Only a matter of time before he wins 4-5 more SBs! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 I've enjoyed the predictable difference in understanding this thread has showcased. Oh, and Mac has a better record sans Rodgers than Lombardi did sans Starr. #renametheSBtrophy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 This a thread full of whoosh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pollino14 Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 52 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: I've enjoyed the predictable difference in understanding this thread has showcased. Oh, and Mac has a better record sans Rodgers than Lombardi did sans Starr. #renametheSBtrophy To be fair nobody has explained what the thread is meaning. It's coming off as a way to promote a groups agenda on here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 13 minutes ago, pollino14 said: To be fair nobody has explained what the thread is meaning. It's coming off as a way to promote a groups agenda on here. You really don't get it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 54 minutes ago, pollino14 said: To be fair nobody has explained what the thread is meaning. It's coming off as a way to promote a groups agenda on here. Just because you can show stats have occurred in a manner doesn't mean you should use them as evidence of an event. Most recent instance the amount of pass yards given up this week. The Bears have put up much less yardage passing, while completely establishing a run game, controlling the clock, keeping a fresh defense and winning the game. Look at the Ravens/Steelers games. They are far more efficient run team. Yet the Packers completely shut down the run game, forced them into passing and it resulted in only 1 offensive touchdown, and a play at that which was a breakdown by assignment. Yet, we're on here complaining about that performance. Say Rodgers played versus the Saints and put up Hundley's stats. Should Saints fans be pissed Aaron Jones ran all over them, while they kept us out of the end zone and shut down the most efficient scoring aspect we have? The answer is no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.