TitanRedd Posted April 14, 2023 Share Posted April 14, 2023 I honestly think we’re trading down. I only see us staying at 11 is if Gonzales or Murphy falls to us, I don’t see us trading up unless Stroud or young falls to 3. I would really prefer us to trade Henry & Tanny to Atlanta for a 2nd & a 3rd 😮💨 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingTitan Posted April 14, 2023 Author Share Posted April 14, 2023 18 minutes ago, TitanRedd said: I don’t show me in history we’ve been able to develop raw QB’s if you willing to trade up or even take him at 11 because you’re confident in developing him, you might as well continue to develop Willis, who has a yr off NFL coaching & much cheaper salary than Richardson. He’s a 1-2 yr project his throwing mechanics & footwork needs work & of course pocket awareness progression. If you want a project QB smartest thing is keep Willis. I heard a good quote, "if we are afraid of taking a QB because the staff won't develop him, then we need to fire the staff." That said, we can't let that fear stop us from drafting anyone. If that is the case, we will never take a QB. But we Tim Kelly, who has made QBs look good in the past and new addition of Charles London, we've yet to see what kind of development we are capable of. But Richardson to me is far and away further along than Willis was/is. Being able to show some success in the SEC is a big deal, and he just has more impressive game clips/examples highlighting his ability to do so, compared to Willis. Mechanics and foot work are maybe the easiest things to teach maybe? But he has pocket awareness, he was one of the less sacked QB's in college football, mainly because of his ability to navigate the pocket and or escape. I don't think he is as big a project as some think. I think when breaking down his games and seeing the examples of all the skills needed is very good foundation to build upon. All that to say tho, He is likely gone before we pick so, I just hope he isn't in the AFC south so I can root for him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TitanRedd Posted April 14, 2023 Share Posted April 14, 2023 34 minutes ago, KingTitan said: I heard a good quote, "if we are afraid of taking a QB because the staff won't develop him, then we need to fire the staff." That said, we can't let that fear stop us from drafting anyone. If that is the case, we will never take a QB. But we Tim Kelly, who has made QBs look good in the past and new addition of Charles London, we've yet to see what kind of development we are capable of. But Richardson to me is far and away further along than Willis was/is. Being able to show some success in the SEC is a big deal, and he just has more impressive game clips/examples highlighting his ability to do so, compared to Willis. Mechanics and foot work are maybe the easiest things to teach maybe? But he has pocket awareness, he was one of the less sacked QB's in college football, mainly because of his ability to navigate the pocket and or escape. I don't think he is as big a project as some think. I think when breaking down his games and seeing the examples of all the skills needed is very good foundation to build upon. All that to say tho, He is likely gone before we pick so, I just hope he isn't in the AFC south so I can root for him. I agree with your assessment about trusting our coaching staff to develop him, I mean that’s their job I sure hope they prove me wrong for once but I totally disagree The claim he’s father along than Willis how with only 13 career starts & looking like gold 1 week & hot sh!t da next Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TitanRedd Posted April 14, 2023 Share Posted April 14, 2023 37 minutes ago, KingTitan said: I heard a good quote, "if we are afraid of taking a QB because the staff won't develop him, then we need to fire the staff." That said, we can't let that fear stop us from drafting anyone. If that is the case, we will never take a QB. But we Tim Kelly, who has made QBs look good in the past and new addition of Charles London, we've yet to see what kind of development we are capable of. But Richardson to me is far and away further along than Willis was/is. Being able to show some success in the SEC is a big deal, and he just has more impressive game clips/examples highlighting his ability to do so, compared to Willis. Mechanics and foot work are maybe the easiest things to teach maybe? But he has pocket awareness, he was one of the less sacked QB's in college football, mainly because of his ability to navigate the pocket and or escape. I don't think he is as big a project as some think. I think when breaking down his games and seeing the examples of all the skills needed is very good foundation to build upon. All that to say tho, He is likely gone before we pick so, I just hope he isn't in the AFC south so I can root for him. He’s a big project as a Florida fan, he’s raw Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingTitan Posted April 15, 2023 Author Share Posted April 15, 2023 I'm not feeling as confident in Stroud as I once was. I'd still take him but.....I have some doubts. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingTitan Posted April 15, 2023 Author Share Posted April 15, 2023 Interesting quote about completion percentage. Thinking about this when talking about Richardson. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TitanSlim Posted April 16, 2023 Share Posted April 16, 2023 1 hour ago, KingTitan said: Interesting quote about completion percentage. Thinking about this when talking about Richardson. Funny that Kaepernick is the guy who he’s talking about here because that’s my comparison for Richardson. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingTitan Posted April 17, 2023 Author Share Posted April 17, 2023 Feels like the calm before the storm. I think we've analyzed every angle of every player. People like me have liked, disliked and liked players. lol Only for us to the most boring thing and take an OT at #11. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingTitan Posted April 17, 2023 Author Share Posted April 17, 2023 I'm also starting to feel on of the QBs fall out of the top 5. If so, I saw a trade scenario of getting CJ Stroud at 6 and giving up:TEN receives: No. 6 overall pick DET receives: No. 11 overall, No. 72 overall, 2024 1st-round pick Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Posted April 17, 2023 Share Posted April 17, 2023 16 minutes ago, KingTitan said: Feels like the calm before the storm. I think we've analyzed every angle of every player. People like me have liked, disliked and liked players. lol Only for us to the most boring thing and take an OT at #11. I think it's extremely likely that the most boring thing still nets us the best overall player that will be available. I'm hoping we go with Broderick Jones if Paris isn't available. I'll accept JSN too since this isn't a great WR class, but we still need a ton of help on the OL. Dillard's an improvement at LT, but who wouldn't be? And he's not gonna be a top 10 left tackle. Be nice to have a stud player on the right side who can eventually move over. Hell, might even find NPF or Radunz has a little trade value to recoup some future mid rounders. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingTitan Posted April 17, 2023 Author Share Posted April 17, 2023 28 minutes ago, Daniel said: I think it's extremely likely that the most boring thing still nets us the best overall player that will be available. I'm hoping we go with Broderick Jones if Paris isn't available. I'll accept JSN too since this isn't a great WR class, but we still need a ton of help on the OL. Dillard's an improvement at LT, but who wouldn't be? And he's not gonna be a top 10 left tackle. Be nice to have a stud player on the right side who can eventually move over. Hell, might even find NPF or Radunz has a little trade value to recoup some future mid rounders. I' m good with serviceable OL at the moment, if we can land an impact player they believe in. Be that on the defensive line, WR or QB. If we are going to take an OL, I'd rather trade back and take a solid player that could be had in the late teens, That's about where I'd value some of these OL prospects. I'd also just like to get another pick or two. Still think we end up making a big move with one of our big 3 of Byard, Henry or Tannehill. Simply because of the numbers. Something has to give. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingTitan Posted April 17, 2023 Author Share Posted April 17, 2023 Tennessee Titans 7-round mock draft with trade back in first round (usatoday.com) I'd love this draft. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
615finest Posted April 17, 2023 Share Posted April 17, 2023 (edited) Edited April 17, 2023 by 615finest 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
615finest Posted April 17, 2023 Share Posted April 17, 2023 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
615finest Posted April 17, 2023 Share Posted April 17, 2023 In person visit and a possible virtual visit with Richardson. Not gone lie, the longer the draft takes to get here the more I want Richardson lol 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.