dafreak Posted November 1, 2022 Share Posted November 1, 2022 2 minutes ago, dll2000 said: Packer's fans - we want Claypool! Bears get him - Claypool was a worthless bum. We got lucky. I said same thing when I thought Packers were going to draft Pickens. If they got him I was going to be like: Ticking time bomb head case. If we got him I was going to be like - bully boy stud. Sour grapes, their misery is just beginning.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dll2000 Posted November 1, 2022 Share Posted November 1, 2022 We have some big WRs in house now in Claypool, Harry and St. Brown. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beardown3231 Posted November 1, 2022 Author Share Posted November 1, 2022 16 minutes ago, Madmike90 said: 1 IMO. I'd take Moore, Pierce and Pickens Still I 100% get your point. Me and JAF used to argue about this but like 15% of second round picks pan out. I guess Claypool is worth it if he continues to catch 60 passes/year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dafreak Posted November 1, 2022 Share Posted November 1, 2022 I wondering if he was expecting to discuss a Clapypool trade: 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEAR FACE DOWN ARROW Posted November 1, 2022 Share Posted November 1, 2022 Um, dumb guy who only watches the Bears question: Is he any good? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dll2000 Posted November 1, 2022 Share Posted November 1, 2022 2 minutes ago, RunningVaccs said: Um, dumb guy who only watches the Bears question: Is he any good? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dafreak Posted November 1, 2022 Share Posted November 1, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AZBearsFan Posted November 1, 2022 Share Posted November 1, 2022 44 minutes ago, Bigbear72 said: Only one. People need to keep that perspective in mind. Additionally, keep in mind who has been the QB there when you consider his production. Let’s see how it plays out. At worst he is a legit No. 2. THE MYSTERY PICK COULD HE ANYTHING! IT COULD EVEN BE A CHASE CLAYPOOL! 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thegurubear Posted November 1, 2022 Share Posted November 1, 2022 Really like this move i bet he he shines here. Very talented I never understood why the steelers didn't use him more in pit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dll2000 Posted November 1, 2022 Share Posted November 1, 2022 6 minutes ago, AZBearsFan said: THE MYSTERY PICK COULD HE ANYTHING! IT COULD EVEN BE A CHASE CLAYPOOL! LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigbear72 Posted November 1, 2022 Share Posted November 1, 2022 Ridley for a 4th Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AZBearsFan Posted November 1, 2022 Share Posted November 1, 2022 Posted about doing this last night. Didn’t include Claypool amongst those I listed because as far as being proven he’s a tier below those guys. Move makes a ton of sense, and if it had to be the higher of the two picks then it is what it is. Have to assume the BAL pick was the 2nd best offer so we needed to sweeten the deal. Unfortunately paying a premium is more of the downside of poor drafting by the prior regime. Make no mistake though - a move like this is a statement by the FO in support of JF1 moving forward. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madmike90 Posted November 1, 2022 Share Posted November 1, 2022 So yeah…do that 😂 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AZBearsFan Posted November 1, 2022 Share Posted November 1, 2022 He’s got a lot of the same stuff about him as what most of us liked about Pickens during draft season. Nasty play demeanor including as a run blocker. Elite physical tools. Downfield ability. Red zone ability. A good portion of the forum wanted to use a 2 on Claypool two years ago. Now we’re doing so with more of an established floor of what he is while his long term potential (he’s only 24) remains sky high, and given what we gave up to get him you’d think he’s going to get every chance to grow into a top receiving option for us. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StLunatic88 Posted November 1, 2022 Share Posted November 1, 2022 17 minutes ago, Bigbear72 said: Ridley for a 4th Not exactly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.