Jump to content

College Football Playoff Rankings


cp0k2

Recommended Posts

17 hours ago, THE DUKE said:

If one of OSU/UM loses to the B1G West champ, the B1G doesn't deserve a playoff team

I kind of want to see.  Just to see some chaos.  Michigan beats OSU, but loses to Iowa --or whoever comes out of the West.  Has the whole OOC narrative brought back into the conversation.  LSU beats Georgia.  Let's see a logjam, and watch the committee dance and squirm.  Maybe have TCU and USC drop one while we're at it, and have a playoff with like 1 conference champion. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a quick comparison.

Ohio State in 2017 goes into Iowa ranked #3 in the country in the AP and #6 in the CFP and loses by 31. Following the loss, they fell from #3 to #11 in the AP and then from #6 to #13 in the CFP rankings.

Tennessee goes into South Carolina ranked #5 in the AP and #5 in the CFP and loses by 25.  Following the loss, they've fallen from #5 to #9 in the AP and a yet to be determined spot in the CFP. 

Both are road conference losses in November. Why does Tennessee only fall 4 spots while Ohio State got punished by falling 8? Both had 2 losses after each blowout. Ohio State's loss prior was to #5 Oklahoma by 15 and had beaten #2 Penn State the week prior by 1. Tennessee's loss prior was to #3 Georgia by 14 and their best win was #3 Alabama by a FG late at the time of the matchups. So a win over LSU, who was 4-2 after said game and weren't the same team they are now is a better secondary win than Ohio State had at that time, so there's that. The next week, Ohio State would go on to dominate #12 Michigan State and pick up wins over #4 Wisconsin and #8 USC to end the year.

Just wondering why the double standard? A blowout loss to an unranked conference foe should be treated equally no matter which conference you play in. Tennessee were 22 point favorites going into SCar and lost by 25. Ohio State were 20.5 point favorites and lost by 31. All things considered, they're almost identical failures.

Just interesting to me.

Edited by beekay414
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, beekay414 said:

Just a quick comparison.

Ohio State in 2017 goes into Iowa ranked #3 in the country in the AP and #6 in the CFP and loses by 31. Following the loss, they fell from #3 to #11 in the AP and then from #6 to #13 in the CFP rankings.

Tennessee goes into South Carolina ranked #5 in the AP and #5 in the CFP and loses by 25.  Following the loss, they've fallen from #5 to #9 in the AP and a yet to be determined spot in the CFP. 

Both are road conference losses in November. Why does Tennessee only fall 4 spots while Ohio State got punished by falling 8? Both had 2 losses after each blowout. Ohio State's loss prior was to #5 Oklahoma by 15 and had beaten #2 Penn State the week prior by 1. Tennessee's loss prior was to #3 Georgia by 14 and their best win was #3 Alabama by a FG late at the time of the matchups. So a win over LSU, who was 4-2 after said game and weren't the same team they are now is a better secondary win than Ohio State had at that time, so there's that. The next week, Ohio State would go on to dominate #12 Michigan State and pick up wins over #4 Wisconsin and #8 USC to end the year.

Just wondering why the double standard? A blowout loss to an unranked conference foe should be treated equally no matter which conference you play in. Tennessee were 22 point favorites going into SCar and lost by 25. Ohio State were 20.5 point favorites and lost by 31. All things considered, they're almost identical failures.

Just interesting to me.

you-know-why-saturday-night-live.gif

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, beekay414 said:

Just a quick comparison.

Ohio State in 2017 goes into Iowa ranked #3 in the country in the AP and #6 in the CFP and loses by 31. Following the loss, they fell from #3 to #11 in the AP and then from #6 to #13 in the CFP rankings.

Tennessee goes into South Carolina ranked #5 in the AP and #5 in the CFP and loses by 25.  Following the loss, they've fallen from #5 to #9 in the AP and a yet to be determined spot in the CFP. 

Both are road conference losses in November. Why does Tennessee only fall 4 spots while Ohio State got punished by falling 8? Both had 2 losses after each blowout. Ohio State's loss prior was to #5 Oklahoma by 15 and had beaten #2 Penn State the week prior by 1. Tennessee's loss prior was to #3 Georgia by 14 and their best win was #3 Alabama by a FG late at the time of the matchups. So a win over LSU, who was 4-2 after said game and weren't the same team they are now is a better secondary win than Ohio State had at that time, so there's that. The next week, Ohio State would go on to dominate #12 Michigan State and pick up wins over #4 Wisconsin and #8 USC to end the year.

Just wondering why the double standard? A blowout loss to an unranked conference foe should be treated equally no matter which conference you play in. Tennessee were 22 point favorites going into SCar and lost by 25. Ohio State were 20.5 point favorites and lost by 31. All things considered, they're almost identical failures.

Just interesting to me.

Because ESPN uses propaganda to influence the committee.

 

It’s going to be worse as the Big 10 leaves ESPN for good.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, beekay414 said:

Just a quick comparison.

Ohio State in 2017 goes into Iowa ranked #3 in the country in the AP and #6 in the CFP and loses by 31. Following the loss, they fell from #3 to #11 in the AP and then from #6 to #13 in the CFP rankings.

Tennessee goes into South Carolina ranked #5 in the AP and #5 in the CFP and loses by 25.  Following the loss, they've fallen from #5 to #9 in the AP and a yet to be determined spot in the CFP. 

Both are road conference losses in November. Why does Tennessee only fall 4 spots while Ohio State got punished by falling 8? Both had 2 losses after each blowout. Ohio State's loss prior was to #5 Oklahoma by 15 and had beaten #2 Penn State the week prior by 1. Tennessee's loss prior was to #3 Georgia by 14 and their best win was #3 Alabama by a FG late at the time of the matchups. So a win over LSU, who was 4-2 after said game and weren't the same team they are now is a better secondary win than Ohio State had at that time, so there's that. The next week, Ohio State would go on to dominate #12 Michigan State and pick up wins over #4 Wisconsin and #8 USC to end the year.

Just wondering why the double standard? A blowout loss to an unranked conference foe should be treated equally no matter which conference you play in. Tennessee were 22 point favorites going into SCar and lost by 25. Ohio State were 20.5 point favorites and lost by 31. All things considered, they're almost identical failures.

Just interesting to me.

The same reason if LSU wins the SEC they’ll go but the loser of OSU/UM stays home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...