CWood21 Posted January 21, 2023 Share Posted January 21, 2023 2 hours ago, Isherwood said: Good post - any thoughts on Tennessee to add to this list? They felt like a possibility last year and I'm not sure what's changed. They didn't trust the rookie to throw the ball at all. Tennessee is probably far more likely than most of the teams on there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chili Posted January 21, 2023 Share Posted January 21, 2023 (edited) 28 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: They save 45 mil from dumping Tannehill, Lewan and Woods. Plus how is #11 a mediocre pick!?1 In relation to other landing spots #11 is mediocre. Raiders got #7, Falcons got #8, Colts got #4. The Packers might view the Jets #13 as better than the Titans #11 because they are an AFC team, sacrificing a few draft slots to ensure Rodgers is out of the conference. Edit: ignore that, i had it in my mind Tennessee was an NFC team. I didn't see Lewan and Woods minimal cap hits and the amount they would save. They're currently $-23,297,933 over the cap. Cutting these two would put them $3,559,733 under the cap. Cutting Tannehill would lower that even further to $21,359,733. Edit: corrected the cap totals. I had a brainfart a few times in this post. So yes Tennessee could definitely be a viable option Edited January 21, 2023 by Chili Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted January 21, 2023 Share Posted January 21, 2023 16 minutes ago, CWood21 said: It just doesn't make sense to trade a very productive RB just to turn around and use that pick to draft their replacement It doesn't make sense to replace (potentially) the same production and save $10million in cap space? It absolutely makes sense to do that. Every team would trade a veteran for a rookie they thought was just as good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fattlipp Posted January 21, 2023 Share Posted January 21, 2023 (edited) Bijan would be better than Jones Next year, and a top 3 back for the next decade, Jones is 3 years tops from being out of the league. Jerrod McKinnon can give you what Jones does at this point. Why…you wanna keep Jones and pay him 20m? or restructure and extend him 3-4 years with void years and add to our cap hell? He will be 30 next year, how man 30 year old back are worth contracts? Maybe if you still have ARod and goo all in and want to keep team chemistry, but if going with Love, start over, rip all the bandaids off and start over. Edited January 21, 2023 by fattlipp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted January 21, 2023 Share Posted January 21, 2023 9 minutes ago, Chili said: In relation to other landing spots #11 is mediocre. Raiders got #7, Falcons got #8, Colts got #4. The Packers might view the Jets #13 as better than the Titans #11 because they are an AFC team, sacrificing a few draft slots to ensure Rodgers is out of the conference. - ignore that, i had it in my mind Tennessee was an NFC team. I didn't see Lewan and Woods minimal cap hits and the amount they would save. They're currently $-23,297,933 over the cap. Cutting these two would put them £3,559,733 under the cap. Cutting Tannehill would push them back over the cap at $-14,240,267. I'm still not sure they have the flexibility they need to pull off trading Rodgers. Edit: I'm not sure my maths is right. Feel free to correct me. They gain 18m from cutting Tanny. They'd be 22m under by cutting those 3. They're also an AFC team so your point about the Jets doesn't make sense. I don't see the Falcons or Colts having any interest in aging QBs, their rosters aren't good enough to go all in. It's the Titans, Raiders or Jets for Rodgers. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fattlipp Posted January 21, 2023 Share Posted January 21, 2023 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: They gain 18m from cutting Tanny. They'd be 22m under by cutting those 3. They're also an AFC team so your point about the Jets doesn't make sense. I don't see the Falcons or Colts having any interest in aging QBs, their rosters aren't good enough to go all in. It's the Titans, Raiders or Jets for Rodgers. Why not the Saints or Tampa? Arod going to Tampa and winning it all with Brady’s roster that went 8-9 seems like something ARod would like to do, hell get 24 and 25 1sts when TB will suck.. Edited January 21, 2023 by fattlipp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Penske Posted January 21, 2023 Share Posted January 21, 2023 If the 49ers lose they’re not possibly in for Rodgers for a year or two? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
{Family Ghost} Posted January 21, 2023 Share Posted January 21, 2023 4 minutes ago, fattlipp said: Why not the Saints or Tampa? Arod going to Tampa and winning it all with Brady’s roster that went 8-9 seems like something ARod would like to do, hell get 24 and 25 1sts when TB will suck.. Trading him to the NFC will be the last resort. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandy Posted January 22, 2023 Share Posted January 22, 2023 11 hours ago, Chili said: They have the one of the worst cap space in the NFL and they seem stuck with Tannehill's contract. Not only that they have a mediocre #11 first round pick and isn't going to generate much interest from the Packers. I don't see it. The Titans have a **** ton of virtual cap space and save almost $18m when they cut Tannehill. They are absolutely a top destination for Rodgers. Also, welcome back! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fattlipp Posted January 22, 2023 Share Posted January 22, 2023 (edited) 11 hours ago, {Family Ghost} said: Trading him to the NFC will be the last resort. Not if we are confident he’s washed up or a diva that’s bad for the franchise, we would wish him on our worst enemy. Edited January 22, 2023 by fattlipp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HokieHigh Posted January 22, 2023 Share Posted January 22, 2023 is this the best class of on the market qbs ever? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted January 22, 2023 Share Posted January 22, 2023 Was thinking about a trade to the Jets that involved us getting Elijah Moore but then I read that Moore basically told Mike LaFleur to "f*ck off" among other things lol. So that's not happening. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Penske Posted January 22, 2023 Share Posted January 22, 2023 (edited) 8 hours ago, Sandy said: The Titans have a **** ton of virtual cap space and save almost $18m when they cut Tannehill. They are absolutely a top destination for Rodgers. Also, welcome back! 17 hours ago, Packerraymond said: They gain 18m from cutting Tanny. They'd be 22m under by cutting those 3. They're also an AFC team so your point about the Jets doesn't make sense. I don't see the Falcons or Colts having any interest in aging QBs, their rosters aren't good enough to go all in. It's the Titans, Raiders or Jets for Rodgers. 18 hours ago, Chili said: In relation to other landing spots #11 is mediocre. Raiders got #7, Falcons got #8, Colts got #4. The Packers might view the Jets #13 as better than the Titans #11 because they are an AFC team, sacrificing a few draft slots to ensure Rodgers is out of the conference. Edit: ignore that, i had it in my mind Tennessee was an NFC team. I didn't see Lewan and Woods minimal cap hits and the amount they would save. They're currently $-23,297,933 over the cap. Cutting these two would put them $3,559,733 under the cap. Cutting Tannehill would lower that even further to $21,359,733. Edit: corrected the cap totals. I had a brainfart a few times in this post. So yes Tennessee could definitely be a viable option 18 hours ago, CWood21 said: Tennessee is probably far more likely than most of the teams on there. What am I missing here? Why would Rodgers want to go to Tennessee? Especially when they’re Supposedly cutting a top Tackle and WR and have minimal other targets? And then have another somewhat high draft pick young QB who wants to play sitting behind you? edit: also why would Tennessee want him? Are they a 40 yr old QB away from a Super Bowl? They’re not going to be able to just trade Rodgers wherever they want, Rodgers will have a role in it or he’ll prob just float retirement. As for places he’d want to go I think it would be Raiders bc of Adams, 49ers if they’re in, and maybe Jets. Edited January 22, 2023 by Arthur Penske Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skibrett15 Posted January 22, 2023 Share Posted January 22, 2023 Why not the giants? Jones is a FA, make a deal for Rodgers and start pushing in some of their cap space they have for 1 receiver Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted January 22, 2023 Share Posted January 22, 2023 Ken Ingalls - Packers Cap - If you are using the Matthew Stafford trade package as a minimum measuring stick for what to expect for a potential Aaron Rodgers trade… 🔹Two 1st Round Picks🔹One 3rd Round Pick🔹Two-time Pro Bowl QB … I believe you are going to be disappointed. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.