Arthur Penske Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 1 hour ago, squire12 said: Does Davante want Rodgers? What better options will he have then would be the question even if he didn’t want him. Brady looked cooked. His team over paying for Lamar? Who else? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Penske Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 Matt Schneiderman put an interesting consideration out there. A team giving up a somewhat early pick like a 2nd and that a conditional 1st rounder in 2024 if Rodgers plays. Teams may not want to give up a load of high picks for someone who may not even play in 2024. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LacyIsGood Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Arthur Penske said: Matt Schneiderman put an interesting consideration out there. A team giving up a somewhat early pick like a 2nd and that a conditional 1st rounder in 2024 if Rodgers plays. Teams may not want to give up a load of high picks for someone who may not even play in 2024. Yeah I see that. Or a performance based conditional. I don’t think they can get more than a high 2nd in 2023. Would be nice to get a mid rounder thrown in there too Then another pick for 2024 Edited January 23, 2023 by LacyIsGood Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 1 hour ago, vegas492 said: Let me text him and see..... "Let's roll". Was his response. Your crap cellular provider dropped the last part of the text. Which was......" ....with Brady" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 58 minutes ago, Arthur Penske said: What better options will he have then would be the question even if he didn’t want him. Brady looked cooked. His team over paying for Lamar? Who else? Brady, JimmyG, Tannehill, rookie, etc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vegas492 Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 30 minutes ago, squire12 said: Your crap cellular provider dropped the last part of the text. Which was......" ....with Brady" I gotta update the security on my phone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HokieHigh Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 5 hours ago, Pugger said: Really? When? After he broke his thumb? Rodgers hinted that there were conversations about what could happen (Jordan Love playing) if we were eliminated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isherwood Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 I’m “edging” 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Guy Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 3 hours ago, Arthur Penske said: What better options will he have then would be the question even if he didn’t want him. Brady looked cooked. His team over paying for Lamar? Who else? Plus, Brady throws short and over the middle. Hunter Renfrow would prosper with Brady, but Adams would struggle. Agree on Brady looking cooked as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Guy Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 Does anybody actually believe Rodgers comments about him being able to walk away from the money next year with his camp obviously in on the, 'Rodgers might get traded leaks?' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StatKing Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 3 hours ago, LacyIsGood said: If I understand correctly…his 3 year extension is really a 1 year deal, re-evaluate, and then a 2 year deal. That signals some stability to a trading team. Also everyone knows his retirement talk is just a leverage play You guys act like there's a huge market for 40 year old diva QBs. No team is going to want to trade the requisite capital to acquire him and Gutes already made it clear we aren't trading him for pennies on the dollar. Just get the idea out of your head now because it isn't happening. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StatKing Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 16 minutes ago, Old Guy said: Does anybody actually believe Rodgers comments about him being able to walk away from the money next year with his camp obviously in on the, 'Rodgers might get traded leaks?' Hell no. He ain't walking away from 100+ million. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 2 minutes ago, StatKing said: You guys act like there's a huge market for 40 year old diva QBs. No team is going to want to trade the requisite capital to acquire him and Gutes already made it clear we aren't trading him for pennies on the dollar. Just get the idea out of your head now because it isn't happening. Not true at all....in fact you should be very happy when we trade him to the Jets for draft picks....AND....they send us your #2 QB man crush Wilson to back up Love! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 9 hours ago, Old Guy said: Not sure anyone should conclude San Francisco is off the market for a QB. Jimmy G got them to the Super Bowl but not over the hump. Shanahan decided to go get Lance. In order for Purdy's job to be safe next year, he needs to win it all IMO. Dallas exposed his limitations yesterday. Not sure SF can beat Cincinnati with Purdy at QB. The problem with San Fran being a destination is draft capital or lack thereof. I wouldn't shut them out, but I'd definitely put them in the very unlikely (<1%) category. It's not just the Brock Purdy success, but the fact that they invested 3 FRPs into Trey Lance. One of them is their starting QB next year. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 6 hours ago, Leader said: Ken Ingalls - Packers Cap - I heard this reasonable Aaron Rodgers trade compensation package on Head of the Pack today: 2023 Day 2 Pick 2024 Conditional 1st Round Pick 2024 condition on if Rodgers plays in 2024 Assuming this is a typo? It's going to be really hard to include a '24 pick when the '24 season happens after. What's stopping the team the Packers trading him to convincing Rodgers to "retire" before the draft, and then unretire after. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.