R T Posted March 26, 2023 Share Posted March 26, 2023 23 minutes ago, TransientTexan said: I think it is “bat-**** crazy fan talk” to say that GB would give him to the NYJ for a conditional 7th. there are lines to draw. That does not make someone “unstable”. You're attempting to change from what I quoted, but no stable person is claiming the compensation should be a conditional 7th and no stable person is debating such a foolish offer. To claim the Packers should trade him elsewhere for less than what could be gained from the Jets to stick it to the Jets is the ramblings of idiots. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coachbuns Posted March 26, 2023 Share Posted March 26, 2023 29 minutes ago, {Family Ghost} said: I'd settle up for those two seconds this year and a conditional pick in 24 or 25. 2 seconds this year and a useful player and a set pick next year if Rodgers steps foot on the field. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted March 26, 2023 Share Posted March 26, 2023 Amusing that Jets' fans are convinced that it's better to walk away from Rodgers and sign someone like Matt Ryan or Teddy Bridgewater instead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tperk Posted March 26, 2023 Share Posted March 26, 2023 8 minutes ago, CWood21 said: Amusing that Jets' fans are convinced that it's better to walk away from Rodgers and sign someone like Matt Ryan or Teddy Bridgewater instead. There are a few delusional ones in there, that's for sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uffdaswede Posted March 26, 2023 Share Posted March 26, 2023 56 minutes ago, TransientTexan said: I think it is “bat-**** crazy fan talk” to say that GB would give him to the NYJ for a conditional 7th. there are lines to draw. That does not make someone “unstable”. It does not. Unstable is grabbing our tridents and chains and meeting the Jets fans in a Walmart parking lot. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R T Posted March 26, 2023 Share Posted March 26, 2023 2 minutes ago, Uffdaswede said: It does not. Unstable is grabbing our tridents and chains and meeting the Jets fans in a Walmart parking lot. Don't give them ideas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rainmaker90 Posted March 26, 2023 Share Posted March 26, 2023 19 minutes ago, CWood21 said: Amusing that Jets' fans are convinced that it's better to walk away from Rodgers and sign someone like Matt Ryan or Teddy Bridgewater instead. Dude, one said they could call up Phillip Rivers 🤣🤣 There’s some strange stuff going on over there. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beekay414 Posted March 26, 2023 Share Posted March 26, 2023 16 minutes ago, Rainmaker90 said: Dude, one said they could call up Phillip Rivers 🤣🤣 There’s some strange stuff going on over there. Once they start mentioning Carson Wentz, they've reached maximum desperation. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChaRisMa Posted March 26, 2023 Share Posted March 26, 2023 1 hour ago, R T said: This is bat-**** crazy fan talk, because some fans in both fanbases are unstable individuals doesn't mean those in the FO's are. Very little chance any of the real decision makers on this deal are wigging out like you are. I think the use of the term literally is far over used. I literally started my post with, “Playing devil’s advocate here,” And that has happened multiple times in NFL history and happens all over Earth every day, including at the highest levels on Earth. One party feels the other party at some point stopped negotiating in good faith, or ethically—outright refuse doing business with them. I for one already feel mislead by the Jets. (Ask me why) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted March 26, 2023 Share Posted March 26, 2023 4 minutes ago, ChaRisMa said: I think the use of the term literally is far over used. I literally started my post with, “Playing devil’s advocate here,” And that has happened multiple times in NFL history and happens all over Earth every day, including at the highest levels on Earth. One party feels the other party at some point stopped negotiating in good faith, or ethically—outright refuse doing business with them. I for one already feel mislead by the Jets. (Ask me why) Why Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rainmaker90 Posted March 26, 2023 Share Posted March 26, 2023 2 minutes ago, beekay414 said: Once they start mentioning Carson Wentz, they've reached maximum desperation. You can’t tell these dudes nothin. They have an answer for everything. They’re winning the gold for mental gymnastics . They would rather go into the season with Zach Wilson as their starter, than to ‘lose’ the trade. It is wild. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChaRisMa Posted March 26, 2023 Share Posted March 26, 2023 2 hours ago, CWood21 said: Given how bad the Packers draft in the 3rd round... #13 #42 #43 #112 '24 Conditional Pick for #15 #78 QB Aaron Rodgers That's worth roughly the 17th/18th pick. The Jets have picks at 15 and 78 in the first 3 rounds. Listen, I know the 3rd round thing is a great joke around here. But it’s a cold hand fallacy. We can successfully choose a third round pick. Deguara may still have a shot to hit this season. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Fussnputz Posted March 26, 2023 Share Posted March 26, 2023 I would love for the Jets to sign Matt Ryan and start the season 0-4. A little shock therapy for the Jets, then we can get a real haul from them for Rodgers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChaRisMa Posted March 26, 2023 Share Posted March 26, 2023 10 minutes ago, incognito_man said: Why Not even in New York. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TransientTexan Posted March 26, 2023 Share Posted March 26, 2023 2 hours ago, R T said: You're attempting to change from what I quoted, but no stable person is claiming the compensation should be a conditional 7th and no stable person is debating such a foolish offer. To claim the Packers should trade him elsewhere for less than what could be gained from the Jets to stick it to the Jets is the ramblings of idiots. I’m not trying to change anything. I’m just bringing it up because the person that you seemed to be echoing a few pages ago (in your quote “No one in their right mind is claiming the Packers are retaining Rodgers.“) has made other posts suggested that exact thing about the conditional 7th rounder. And that GB basically has no choice but to get Rodgers off the team, even if that was hypothetically the best offer now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.