Jump to content

How does a prime Antonio brown compare to current WR’s?


CP3MVP

Recommended Posts

This is another entry to my new series. The first was prime Ben to current QBs. How about prime Antonio brown, where would he rank among current wide receivers in the game?

 

I’m  thinking 2014-2018

Edited by CP3MVP
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sammymvpknight said:

Brown played with peak Hill…and Brown was better. I agree with others that he’d probably be #1, removing all recency bias

Not sure I understand this. Peak Tyreek Hill is now, no?

The only other years that would qualify would be 2018 or 2020.

Brown was washed by 2020 so comparing 2018 ->

        Rush Rush Rush Rush Rush Rece Rece Rece Rece Rece
Rk Player Year G Att Yds TD Y/A Lng Rec Yds TD Y/R Lng
1 Antonio Brown 2018 15 0 0 0   0 104 1297 15 12.5 78
2 Tyreek Hill 2018 16 22 151 1 6.9 33 87 1479 12 17.0 75

Obv Brown was targeted more (Hill higher catch %) and ended with 2 more TDs, but 333 more yards for Hill makes it splitting hairs, at best. 

------------------------------

Unless you are simply saying peak for peak Brown was better or broadly combining his prime (13-18), in which ignore all of this because I totally agree.

But then I'm confused by the "played with peak Hill", because again, I think this might be Hill's best year tbh. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Soggust said:

Not sure I understand this. Peak Tyreek Hill is now, no?

The only other years that would qualify would be 2018 or 2020.

Brown was washed by 2020 so comparing 2018 ->

        Rush Rush Rush Rush Rush Rece Rece Rece Rece Rece
Rk Player Year G Att Yds TD Y/A Lng Rec Yds TD Y/R Lng
1 Antonio Brown 2018 15 0 0 0   0 104 1297 15 12.5 78
2 Tyreek Hill 2018 16 22 151 1 6.9 33 87 1479 12 17.0 75

Obv Brown was targeted more (Hill higher catch %) and ended with 2 more TDs, but 333 more yards for Hill makes it splitting hairs, at best. 

------------------------------

Unless you are simply saying peak for peak Brown was better or broadly combining his prime (13-18), in which ignore all of this because I totally agree.

But then I'm confused by the "played with peak Hill", because again, I think this might be Hill's best year tbh. 

You put way too much work on that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...