Jump to content

The 2023 Offseason Thread


EaglesPeteC

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Danger said:

Imagine being upset with being in the Super Bowl 2 years of the last 6 and getting a championship.

Some people hate success. Even if it's there own team. 

Was just reading a cowboy fan trying to trash us on losing in the SB, finally winning a SB after forever and all the Ls in the playoffs. Thought that was insane coming from a cowboy fan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, EaglesFlySBChampsHigh said:

Not really what the point is with this still though. 

 

Because you keep bringing it up.

 

1 hour ago, EaglesFlySBChampsHigh said:

Then why would Graham say he had a few teams trying to sign him? Makes zero sense to me. If I remember correctly browns were one of the teams

Could be wrong but feel like I heard Kelce say similar on his podcast

 

1 hour ago, EaglesFlySBChampsHigh said:

I somewhat get what you're saying. It's a lot of info to take in. How was it not tampering that teams were calling BG then? 

 

55 minutes ago, EaglesFlySBChampsHigh said:

That still makes no sense to me. Why I keep asking the question. 

Does that mean they had 1 day to tamper? 

 

47 minutes ago, EaglesFlySBChampsHigh said:

Was it the same for cox too with the contract? Browns tried to get him also

 

37 minutes ago, EaglesFlySBChampsHigh said:

I heard BG say this from his mouth. No idea who saalk is. 

 

26 minutes ago, EaglesFlySBChampsHigh said:

BG never said he wanted to play for them. They asked him what teams were interested/his agent talked to. He kept it short but he mentioned the browns. It wasn't sb week. Was after he signed back with us. Believe it was his eagles presser or a podcast. I watch way way too much eagles content daily to remember everything. Here's Tim McManus on it tho. Since there needs to be proof

According to Tim McManus, who covers the Philadelphia Eagles for ESPN, veteran defensive lineman Brandon Graham is drawing interest from the Browns. This comes a day after a rumor came out that Graham was also interested in reuniting with Schwartz in Cleveland

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, downundermike said:

Did you look at the dates ??  All from March 5th or earlier.

You asked for a source of the info. I just gave you Tim McManus link. Was just an example. Like I originally said it was said in a presser or podcast. No idea when that date was exactly I don't save these things on my computer to bring back up months later

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, EaglesFlySBChampsHigh said:

No crap Mike lol. Cause you kept going too. You said you'll ask your friend but kept asking where it was. It kept getting further from the original question

Well, now that I have given you the following, we do not need that answer.

Eagles signed Brandon Graham to a new deal on March 10th, 5 days before the legal tampering period.

https://www.si.com/nfl/eagles/news/brandon-graham-returns-to-eagles-on-one-year-deal

Legal tampering period began on March 15th, 5 days after Graham had a new deal in place with the Eagles

https://chiefswire.usatoday.com/2023/03/13/kansas-city-chiefs-2023-nfl-free-agency-legal-tampering-period-begins/#:~:text=The NFL's legal tampering period,at 11%3A00 a.m. CT.

All the Graham and Browns articles were March 5t or earlier.

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2023/03/05/browns-could-make-a-run-at-brandon-graham/

 

I am going to say this slowly, one more time.

 

THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO TIME THAT THE BROWNS, BRANDON GRAHAM, OR BRANDON GRAHAMS AGENT COULD HAVE HAD ANY CONTACT ABOUT HIM PLAYING FOR THEM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, EaglesFlySBChampsHigh said:

All the Howie nonsense ? Complaining about contracts? Don't think he meant literally about the SB. Think it was more bashing a gm/team that has put us in position twice now in short order. 

🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, EaglesFlySBChampsHigh said:

You asked for a source of the info. I just gave you Tim McManus link. Was just an example. Like I originally said it was said in a presser or podcast. No idea when that date was exactly I don't save these things on my computer to bring back up months later

 

Here is the tweet, March 3rd, 7 days before Graham agreed to terms with the Eagles, and 12 days before legal tampering began.

This was all just rumor from one guy who claims to be a source with the Browns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, downundermike said:

Well, now that I have given you the following, we do not need that answer.

Eagles signed Brandon Graham to a new deal on March 10th, 5 days before the legal tampering period.

https://www.si.com/nfl/eagles/news/brandon-graham-returns-to-eagles-on-one-year-deal

Legal tampering period began on March 15th, 5 days after Graham had a new deal in place with the Eagles

https://chiefswire.usatoday.com/2023/03/13/kansas-city-chiefs-2023-nfl-free-agency-legal-tampering-period-begins/#:~:text=The NFL's legal tampering period,at 11%3A00 a.m. CT.

All the Graham and Browns articles were March 5t or earlier.

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2023/03/05/browns-could-make-a-run-at-brandon-graham/

 

I am going to say this slowly, one more time.

 

THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO TIME THAT THE BROWNS, BRANDON GRAHAM, OR BRANDON GRAHAMS AGENT COULD HAVE HAD ANY CONTACT ABOUT HIM PLAYING FOR THEM.

Cool lol. Are you his agent? You're really fired up on this. They tempered then. 

Cardinals couldn't talk to Gannon but they did

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...