RaidersAreOne Posted March 14, 2023 Share Posted March 14, 2023 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaidersAreOne Posted March 14, 2023 Author Share Posted March 14, 2023 Meyers should be a rock solid #2 behind Tae. Still young at 26 and the money is very fair. Jimmy G has a very high end weapons group. I just wish we had some answers for our OL and damn D. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaidersAreOne Posted March 14, 2023 Author Share Posted March 14, 2023 Also this is hilarious still. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geezy Posted March 14, 2023 Share Posted March 14, 2023 Gonna air it out with a fragile QB behind bad OL. Lol imagine if Gruden pulled this ****. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaidersAreOne Posted March 14, 2023 Author Share Posted March 14, 2023 I wonder if we're shipping Renfrow out? That is a lot of money tied up into WR/TE/RB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geezy Posted March 14, 2023 Share Posted March 14, 2023 Not saying he’s a bad player, he’ll be a good #2 and an huge upgrade over Hollins. My concern is the OL and defense. At what point do we address those issues? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpaulthe1st Posted March 14, 2023 Share Posted March 14, 2023 This is prime Gruden madness. Tons of cap space being dumped into the skill positions while the gaping holes on Defense and O-Line are largely ignored. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightmare Posted March 14, 2023 Share Posted March 14, 2023 I’m fine with this signing. I thought he’d command more on the open market. Really, really need to start addressing the OL though or having a bunch of pretty weapons means nothing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaidersAreOne Posted March 14, 2023 Author Share Posted March 14, 2023 1 minute ago, jpaulthe1st said: This is prime Gruden madness. Tons of cap space being dumped into the skill positions while the gaping holes on Defense and O-Line are largely ignored. It's certainly not how I would allocate resources. However I am glad we didn't get into an insane bidding wars and wayyyy overpaid the likes of McGlinchey. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
agarcia34 Posted March 14, 2023 Share Posted March 14, 2023 I like it. WR was very much a need IMO. We saw the lack of talent at that position last year. Mack did his best as a number 2 WR but he just wasn’t a number 2. Now Adam’s has a legit weapon on the other side. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimkelly02 Posted March 14, 2023 Share Posted March 14, 2023 1 minute ago, jpaulthe1st said: This is prime Gruden madness. Tons of cap space being dumped into the skill positions while the gaping holes on Defense and O-Line are largely ignored. Exactly! We sign scrub Jimmy G which means were going to have to rely heavily on the run game….. and then we spend 11M annual on a 2nd WR who is slow and physically limited? Why not spend 3-4M on a WR and spend 8M on a OLmen? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaidersAreOne Posted March 14, 2023 Author Share Posted March 14, 2023 6 minutes ago, RaidersAreOne said: I wonder if we're shipping Renfrow out? That is a lot of money tied up into WR/TE/RB. To add to this, doesn't Meyers play in the slot quite a bit? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geezy Posted March 14, 2023 Share Posted March 14, 2023 Shaq Mason was traded for a late round pick swap. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaidersAreOne Posted March 14, 2023 Author Share Posted March 14, 2023 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimkelly02 Posted March 14, 2023 Share Posted March 14, 2023 Just now, RaidersAreOne said: To add to this, doesn't Meyers play in the slot quite a bit? I believe so… I mean he’s 4.63 WR. what does this mean for Renfrow? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.