ThatJerkDave Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 1 hour ago, Zycho32 said: So he's Rex Grossman 2.0? Maybe Michael Bishop or Josh Freeman. Maybe even Kyle Boller. He has an amazing arm, but he stinks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beekay414 Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 Joe Flacco, in reality, is Rex Grossman 2.0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NFLGURU Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 Grossman was labeled the "Next Brett Favre" when he got drafted out of Florida. That never panned out or was even close but he did start as many Super Bowls as Rodgers has. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rosser80 Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 2 hours ago, Kepler said: Only for stapler jokes 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 5 hours ago, moretti19 said: If Joe Milton is available in round 3 would you take him? No. Maybe a late-ish Day 3 pick at best. Don't think he unseats Sean Clifford, and I'm not even that high on Clifford. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 6 hours ago, squire12 said: Hypothetical....if NE offered pick 68 for Doubs, would you do it? No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chili Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 (edited) Tony Pauline in one of his articles said that the Giants had dinner with Graham Barton. The Giants would be picking at #6 and then at #47. Clearly picking him at #6 is too high. Don't think they would trade down as they would be passing on the likes of Alt, Harrison and Nabers. Based on those draft slots it sounds like they're hoping he would be there at #47. However the Packers have pick #41 so the Giants would need to package a trade up for him if he does indeed fall that far. In the same article Pauline said some scouts think he secured himself a place for himself n the 1st round. Based on those two pieces of info it does sound like he could go anywhere in late 1st to early 2nd. Both of which the Packers are well positioned. Edited March 30 by Chili Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R T Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 15 hours ago, beekay414 said: We're tied for the most picks in the draft IIRC. We have the picks for it IMO. I think the position is far from a luxury, it's probably vital to unlocking the potential to a juggernaut. We're so used to Rodgers ignoring TEs that we don't know how to appreciate wanting them lol. Sinnott's going to be a Packer. I feel it in my bones. I could easily see that happening, but it would probably need to happen at #58 not #88 and instantly he will be hated by many because the self-proclaimed draft gurus will claim he was over drafted. He is closer to Sam LaPorta than Josiah Deguara and will probably go in that 50-70 range. The media often misses on it with TE's, LaPorta was 59th on the final big board last season and went 34th overall. Luke Schoonmaker 101st and went 58th, Brenton Strange was 130th and went 61st. Also think they are missing it badly with Sinnott this year, his name probably gets called well before the late third round. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChaRisMa Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 Ding ding ding ding ding. We’ve got our 50th 1st round player per experts. The Honor goes to Graham Barton. I don’t know what reason the NFL will give for the extra 18 1st round picks, but…there are now 50 1st round players just like every other year. No expert will ever point out there can only be 32 1s. There is going to be someone available at 41 that someone has been labeled a lock for round 1. I hope it’s a position of need. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 16 hours ago, beekay414 said: We're tied for the most picks in the draft IIRC. We have the picks for it IMO. I think the position is far from a luxury, it's probably vital to unlocking the potential to a juggernaut. We're so used to Rodgers ignoring TEs that we don't know how to appreciate wanting them lol. Sinnott's going to be a Packer. I feel it in my bones. I've been a fan of Sinnott for a while so no objection here. At this point, I'm not going to object to the Packers building around Love. Whether that's OL and/or the skills, I'm all for it. Defensively yea we need a starting safety for sure and probably some depth at LB and CB but our success IMO is largely on how Hafley uses these guys anyways. We have more than enough talent on that side of the ball to be better than we've been in the past. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 10 minutes ago, ChaRisMa said: Ding ding ding ding ding. We’ve got our 50th 1st round player per experts. The Honor goes to Graham Barton. I don’t know what reason the NFL will give for the extra 18 1st round picks, but…there are now 50 1st round players just like every other year. No expert will ever point out there can only be 32 1s. There is going to be someone available at 41 that someone has been labeled a lock for round 1. I hope it’s a position of need. Barton has been a 1st round pick for awhile? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MantyWrestler Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 10 hours ago, CWood21 said: No. 68! No way. Guy is arguably our best WR. Probably for 34 though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatJerkDave Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 49 minutes ago, packfanfb said: I've been a fan of Sinnott for a while so no objection here. At this point, I'm not going to object to the Packers building around Love. Whether that's OL and/or the skills, I'm all for it. Defensively yea we need a starting safety for sure and probably some depth at LB and CB but our success IMO is largely on how Hafley uses these guys anyways. We have more than enough talent on that side of the ball to be better than we've been in the past. I think I am at the point that I want them to build the safety room like we have the WR room. Take a bunch of them and see who works out. McKinney can be the old man at 25 years old. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spilltray Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 20 minutes ago, MantyWrestler said: 68! No way. Guy is arguably our best WR. Probably for 34 though. I think that's Jayden Reed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sgtcheezwiz Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 Some of yall would trade Doubs for that pick just to pick a receiver. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts