Slinky Posted December 10, 2017 Share Posted December 10, 2017 Should be 21-7. That no call on that PI may have just saved Mac's and Dom's jobs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexGreen#20 Posted December 10, 2017 Share Posted December 10, 2017 There's the Deshone Kizer I'm expecting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodjahs12 Posted December 10, 2017 Share Posted December 10, 2017 Just now, cannondale said: I would have left him in the middle. He gets routed 10 yards past the QB far too often for my liking He isn't anything better than average as an inside backer either. Bringing him back on his current salary for another season would be a crime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted December 10, 2017 Share Posted December 10, 2017 Just now, Rodjahs12 said: This isn't a talented defense. Despite all the capital invested in it, we probably need to invest another draft's worth of top picks to see any kind of serious improvement on a year to year basis. there's talent that isn't healthy too. Badly need at least 1 more edge guy that can stay healthy, however. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packer_ESP Posted December 10, 2017 Share Posted December 10, 2017 1 minute ago, Rodjahs12 said: This isn't a talented defense. Despite all the capital invested in it, we probably need to invest another draft's worth of top picks to see any kind of serious improvement on a year to year basis. The same was said when Hayward and Hyde were here. They looked good but not good enough to retain (and almost no one complained when they left), now they're shining in a different defense. How many potential Hayward/Hydes do we have on this roster right now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacReady Posted December 10, 2017 Share Posted December 10, 2017 Just now, cannondale said: I would have left him in the middle. He gets routed 10 yards past the QB far too often for my liking I'd love him in the middle next year or for us to be a 4-3 team next year. My point is that he still has talent, and anybody who says otherwise is delusional and expects 16 sacks a year. That happens once in a decade. He's not Lawrence Taylor, and that upsets people, so they say he sucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tartarus Posted December 10, 2017 Share Posted December 10, 2017 Needed that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deltarich87 Posted December 10, 2017 Share Posted December 10, 2017 Seeing this pass rush get absolutely nowhere really shows just how terrible the Bucs OL is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacReady Posted December 10, 2017 Share Posted December 10, 2017 Good. Clinton-Dix gets an interception. Looking back on this season, his INT totals will match his talent, not his coordinator. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cannondale Posted December 10, 2017 Share Posted December 10, 2017 Just now, Packer_ESP said: The same was said when Hayward and Hyde were here. They looked good but not good enough to retain (and almost no one complained when they left), now they're shining in a different defense. How many potential Hayward/Hydes do we have on this roster right now? I've wondered the same thing. Doesn't look like we'll ever find out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexGreen#20 Posted December 10, 2017 Share Posted December 10, 2017 If Clay has a role on this team next year, it's as the 4th OLB brought in exclusively for pass rushing situations to rush up the middle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacReady Posted December 10, 2017 Share Posted December 10, 2017 Just now, AlexGreen#20 said: If Clay has a role on this team next year, it's as the 4th OLB brought in exclusively for pass rushing situations to rush up the middle. How does a 31 year old linebacker get 7.5 sacks in a year if he sucks as badly as you say he does? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted December 10, 2017 Share Posted December 10, 2017 Just now, Packer_ESP said: The same was said when Hayward and Hyde were here. They looked good but not good enough to retain (and almost no one complained when they left), now they're shining in a different defense. How many potential Hayward/Hydes do we have on this roster right now? Randall is a guy who, if healthy for stretch of his career, will continue to make strides. He's probably the only guy right now that has any similarity to either Hayward or Hyde. No one else is really playing out of position otherwise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpeightTheVillain Posted December 10, 2017 Share Posted December 10, 2017 1 minute ago, Packer_ESP said: The same was said when Hayward and Hyde were here. They looked good but not good enough to retain (and almost no one complained when they left), now they're shining in a different defense. How many potential Hayward/Hydes do we have on this roster right now? First of all Hyde is playing a completely different position. Is he a better safety then Burnett or Ha-Ha. I don't know what's going on with Ha-Ha but the answer is no. So if you want to pay that much for a third safety then OK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted December 10, 2017 Share Posted December 10, 2017 Didn't know we were playing Tom Brady today. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.