chargerbuckeye Posted December 8, 2017 Author Share Posted December 8, 2017 1 hour ago, Fray32 said: you give proud Brady haters like myself a bad name I'm the biggest brady hater on planet earth, and he owes his nfl career to Walt Coleman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chargerbuckeye Posted December 8, 2017 Author Share Posted December 8, 2017 1 hour ago, rf54 said: No way GB wins this years superbowl, They may get beat by the Browns Sunday. Browns suck too much to beat GB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Ramster Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 1 hour ago, chargerbuckeye said: Browns suck too much to beat GB. For Sashi Brown They'll come out fired up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chargerbuckeye Posted December 8, 2017 Author Share Posted December 8, 2017 2 hours ago, El ramster said: For Sashi Brown They'll come out fired up GTFOH. If Hundley could beat the Bucs, he can beat the browns Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunter2_1 Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 Can a mod can this poster and thread please? This is insulting my intelligence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
biletnikoff Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TXsteeler Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 16 hours ago, chargerbuckeye said: If you lead the league in Rushing, That other nonsense doesn't make a difference Where is the Dislike button? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TXsteeler Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 16 hours ago, chargerbuckeye said: We will find out week 15, won't we. No, NFL offense is an objective measurement like who's the strongest person or who can jump the highest. There are some things that can cause the performances to vary over time but at the end of the day, you can measure it easily. Statistically the Patriots are a better offense than the Steelers in so many metrics through 12 games. We can say with good confidence that they have the better offense, When they play each other won't prove anything more either because offenses don't play each other. This year's Browns offense playing with the 2013 Seahawks defense would roflstomp the 2007 Patriots offense playing with a high school defense, but that doesn't make the Brown's offense better than the Patriots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chargerbuckeye Posted December 8, 2017 Author Share Posted December 8, 2017 9 hours ago, Hunter2_1 said: Can a mod can this poster and thread please? This is insulting my intelligence. Patriots fans have intelligence? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chargerbuckeye Posted December 8, 2017 Author Share Posted December 8, 2017 9 hours ago, biletnikoff said: Who do you have the Browns getting that win against curiously. Also, seeing as you posted that, why don't you post some playoff predictions, That's what I intended the thread to be, but patriot fans trying to hijack this thread, but I am not letting them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TXsteeler Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 28 minutes ago, chargerbuckeye said: Who do you have the Browns getting that win against curiously. Also, seeing as you posted that, why don't you post some playoff predictions, That's what I intended the thread to be, but patriot fans trying to hijack this thread, but I am not letting them Its not just patriots fans, its anybody with common sense that can clearly see that the Steelers are not the top offense in the NFL this year and are worse than the Patriots. I would bet you most Steelers fans on this site would agree as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 AFC: 1. NE = 13-3 2. Pit = 13-3 3. Tenn = 10-6 4. LA Chargers = 9-7 5. Jacksonville = 10-6 6. Baltimore = 9-7 NFC: 1 Philly = 13-3 2 Minnesota = 12-4 3 Atlanta = 11-5 4 Seattle = 11-5 5 LA Rams = 11-5 6 Carolina = 11-5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sp6488 Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 48 minutes ago, MathMan said: AFC: 1. NE = 13-3 2. Pit = 13-3 3. Tenn = 10-6 4. LA Chargers = 9-7 5. Jacksonville = 10-6 6. Baltimore = 9-7 NFC: 1 Philly = 13-3 2 Minnesota = 12-4 3 Atlanta = 11-5 4 Seattle = 11-5 5 LA Rams = 11-5 6 Carolina = 11-5 OOC, who do you have Baltimore's second loss in the remaining four coming against? I understand Pit, but between Cle, Ind and Cin, they should easily be TD favorites in each. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 24 minutes ago, sp6488 said: OOC, who do you have Baltimore's second loss in the remaining four coming against? I understand Pit, but between Cle, Ind and Cin, they should easily be TD favorites in each. Currently on survivorgrid.com, balt is 2.5 point favorites against cincy. That said, I picked cincy. These div matchups can go either way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sp6488 Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 51 minutes ago, MathMan said: Currently on survivorgrid.com, balt is 2.5 point favorites against cincy. That said, I picked cincy. These div matchups can go either way. That's an odd line. Typically a team lays three just for being at home (which the Ravens will be). Further, they obliterated them the last time they played and have shown to be a better team to date. Not to mention, Cincy will likely be completely eliminated by then. I'm not saying it's a guaranteed win by any stretch, and you're right division games can get weird, but I do think they should/will be strong (TD) favorites by the time that game rolls around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.