Week 4 MNF: Seattle Seahawks (2-1) at NY Giants (1-2)

[incognito_man]

Witherspoon was one of my favorite prospects I ever watched

[D82]

1 minute ago, Dan33185 said:

Not a great throw obviously, but they aren't down 21-3 because of Daniel Jones, he is getting zero time to throw, nobody would look good behind that line right now.

This is a joke…right?

[incognito_man]

3 minutes ago, Duluther said:

This is the rookie we should all be glad Detroit didn't get (by one pick), @incognito_man.

He's the truth 

[StatKing]

1 minute ago, Dan33185 said:

Not a great throw obviously, but they aren't down 21-3 because of Daniel Jones, he is getting zero time to throw, nobody would look good behind that line right now.

It was 14-3. The guy is paid 40 million a year. Make a couple throws.

[lavar703]

Daniel Jones sucks when he's not playing Washington. 

[Jakuvious]

2 minutes ago, Dan33185 said:

Not a great throw obviously, but they aren't down 21-3 because of Daniel Jones, he is getting zero time to throw, nobody would look good behind that line right now.

This feels relevant.

Everything on O tends to look better when the QB position does. The Giants don't have an all-star supporting cast, but 3 points by an offense is never acceptable.

[K9]

Honest question: who's better? Daniel Jones, Justin Fields or Zach Wilson?

[Dan33185]

1 minute ago, D82 said:

This is a joke…right?

I never joke.

[riceman80]

1 minute ago, StatKing said:

It was 14-3. The guy is paid 40 million a year. Make a couple throws.

Indeed. 80% of Mahomes pay, 1% of his ability. You don't get paid $40 mil to be a game manager

[4thandInches]

1 minute ago, Jakuvious said:

This feels relevant.

Everything on O tends to look better when the QB position does. The Giants don't have an all-star supporting cast, but 3 points by an offense is never acceptable.

Texans skilled position players are light years better than giants without Saquon.

[Tugboat]

Just now, Jakuvious said:

This feels relevant.

Everything on O tends to look better when the QB position does. The Giants don't have an all-star supporting cast, but 3 points by an offense is never acceptable.

 

Yeah.  I spent a lot of years always thinking, "if they can just build this monolithic OLine, the bad QBs will look a little better".  But it often actually ends up working partially the other way 'round.  A really good QB can really elevate a very mediocre OLine and make them look a lot better than they are.

 

Though in this case...i think it's a composite of both.  A bad QB making an awful OLine look even more pathetic.

[Jameson_Neat]

Just now, Jakuvious said:

This feels relevant.

Everything on O tends to look better when the QB position does. The Giants don't have an all-star supporting cast, but 3 points by an offense is never acceptable.

They've looked incompetent in every game no matter who's on the field.

Not a good look for Daboll. 

[Chiefer]

at least we all get to see how good Devon Witherspoon is in primetime

[K9]

1 minute ago, Tugboat said:

 

Yeah.  I spent a lot of years always thinking, "if they can just build this monolithic OLine, the bad QBs will look a little better".  But it often actually ends up working partially the other way 'round.  A really good QB can really elevate a very mediocre OLine and make them look a lot better than they are.

 

Though in this case...i think it's a composite of both.  A bad QB making an awful OLine look even more pathetic.

This interesting... I never thought of it this way but it make sense. 

[rob_shadows]

4 minutes ago, incognito_man said:

He's the truth 

I am 99.9% sure he was who Detroit originally planned on selecting.