Jump to content

We Can Still Crack the Top Ten


MacReady

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, squire12 said:

is it more work than just spewing random **** about OT being high bust rates from the 1st round that appears to be inaccurate?

Round-1-miss-rates-by-position.jpg?resiz

I literally posted the last two draft classes, and it seems no one is gonna post any context about this ^^^

Literally all I want is what years this makes up, and what constitutes a bust and a miss. I'm not even trying to argue. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ReasonablySober said:

Round-1-miss-rates-by-position.jpg?resiz

I literally posted the last two draft classes, and it seems no one is gonna post any context about this ^^^

Literally all I want is what years this makes up, and what constitutes a bust and a miss. I'm not even trying to argue. 

do you ******* seriously not know how to use google?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, ReasonablySober said:

Am I allowed to ask for context? What years that chart makes up? What constitutes a miss and what makes up a hit?

https://phillycovercorner.com/2023/04/first-round-draft-success-rates-who-could-be-risky-in-the-2023-draft/

I think the graph in question covers 2000-22, if the preceding ones are connected to it. Misses and Hits are vague- the article describes that as below the 60th Percentile(or someone rated 55-65th overall in the draft.

Edited by Zycho32
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Zycho32 said:

My god, thank you!

ETA: that page doesn't do an especially good job explaining needed information either. So I guess I'm giving up on this one. 

Edited by ReasonablySober
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ReasonablySober said:

Holy crap, man. You don't think the onus is on the dude providing the chart to provide what the chart says?

nibD5BI.png

Charts are meaningless without needed context. 

i told you the exact search words and phrase to insert into google.  I linked some of them for you.   the 1 you are bitching about is like the 5 link in the search.

And yes, it is on you to support your claim that OT have a higher bust rate than other positions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, we have the draft capital.......If we are at 8-10 we should highly......HIGHLY entertain moving up for one of the blue chip left tackles.  Id actually have no problem parting with the 2 second rounders if we can use them as a move up package to like 4-5 if we need to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...