Jump to content

Who do you want to see as our next HC and GM?


RaidersAreOne

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, Jerry said:

49ers roster in 2010 before Harbaugh was hired wasn’t exactly stacked. 

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/sfo/2010_roster.htm

Your statement regarding his way of motivating men is nonsense. Clearly he motivated the 49ers to go to the SB. 

Harbaugh was so good at coaching you really believe Kaepernick was good. But he really wasn’t. Seriously, his best season was 25 TDs and 8 INTs. Same as Derek Carrs season this year. 

https://www.espn.com/nfl/player/stats/_/id/14001/colin-kaepernick

You can dislike him all you want, but the man wins. Period.

But his football style is boring and he's cringe and corny

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, justwinbaby81 said:

But his football style is boring and he's cringe and corny

Lol.

if cringe and corny translates to 10+ wins and the Raiders in the playoffs every season he’s our HC, I’ll take it.

I’ll even start drinking milk with my steak. Idgaf. I’ll do it. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Jeremy408 said:

 oh no! Hopefully it's just the Rooney rule

They’re already interviewing Steve Wilks, which meets the Rooney Rule criteria - so they didn’t need to interview Graham if that was their only intention by interviewing him.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, NYRaider said:

Having a franchise QB in place is nice but aren't they pretty limited with their roster flexibility?

They're currently projected to have -$32M in cap space with a mediocre defense featuring an aging Khalil Mack (potential cap casualty). And they're set to lose Ekeler (free agency) and Linsley (retirement) with aging and injury prone receivers in Allen (32 / $11M in cap savings) and Williams (30 / $20M in cap savings)

And you also have to account for the fact that Herbet's mega deal is getting ready to kick in which we've seen become an issue for teams like the Chiefs, Seahawks, etc. 

Yea but what they stand to lose they can just replace in the draft. Especially with pick 6 each round. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, NYRaider said:

The reality is that most interim guys that are promoted into a full time role flop pretty early.

Same can be said about College coaches going to the NFL. Majority of them flop at the next level

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, bucksavage1 said:

Same can be said about College coaches going to the NFL. Majority of them flop at the next level

Harbaugh has a 44-19-1 record that includes a Super Bowl appearance. He's one of only two coaches in the history of the sport to coach in both a national championship game and a Super Bowl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Jeremy408 said:

Yea but what they stand to lose they can just replace in the draft. Especially with pick 6 each round. 

They're going to be able to potentially replace a pro bowl center, an elite receiver, an elite running back, a high end WR2, and an All-Pro edge in the draft?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, NYRaider said:

They're going to be able to potentially replace a pro bowl center, an elite receiver, an elite running back, a high end WR2, and an All-Pro edge in the draft?

Well, they don't have to replace all all of those players. For example, they don't have to replace Mack. He's just old... sure you may have to replace Ekeler, but he's just a running back and those are dime a dozen. They drafted a WR2 last year(plus if Harbaugh is the coach, they're not gonna pass the ball a whole lot). And then, of course, center is the type where if you have a high draft pick each round you're bound to be able to get a good center on the second day. 
 

And with all of this, the quarterback position is figured out, all that other stuff is much easier. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Nightmare said:

They’re already interviewing Steve Wilks, which meets the Rooney Rule criteria - so they didn’t need to interview Graham if that was their only intention by interviewing him.

Isn't it kind of weird that they're already interviewing guys without a GM currently in place?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jeremy408 said:

Well, they don't have to replace all all of those players. For example, they don't have to replace Mack. He's just old... sure you may have to replace Ekeler, but he's just a running back and those are dime a dozen. They drafted a WR2 last year(plus if Harbaugh is the coach, they're not gonna pass the ball a whole lot). And then, of course, center is the type where if you have a high draft pick each round you're bound to be able to get a good center on the second day. 
 

And with all of this, the quarterback position is figured out, all that other stuff is much easier. 

It's easier said than done to replace great players and we've seen Herbert struggle significantly without their key pieces around him. He has regressed pretty significantly over the last two seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...