RaisinBran Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 Doesn't look like we will be able to get Williams or Maye without trading away our souls. I'd be happy with Daniels or Penix but even they might not make it to us (maybe we can trade up where needed to get one of them). I'd prefer not to sign a FA QB again. Worst case scenario we re-load with AOC at the helm...but not my first (or second) choice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 31 minutes ago, RaisinBran said: Doesn't look like we will be able to get Williams or Maye without trading away our souls. I'd be happy with Daniels or Penix but even they might not make it to us (maybe we can trade up where needed to get one of them). I'd prefer not to sign a FA QB again. Worst case scenario we re-load with AOC at the helm...but not my first (or second) choice. I feel like Daniels or Penix could be had around the 9th/10th pick. So if we like one of them enough we may consider doing a slight trade up. I wonder what the capital would need to be to make it happen. It's a stingy business when it comes to rookie QBs. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyPhil1781 Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 Did I just read McCarthy would be considered a top overall pick if he went back? Oh boy.... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
big_palooka Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 7 hours ago, BobbyPhil1781 said: Did I just read McCarthy would be considered a top overall pick if he went back? Oh boy.... Your Ohio St. bias has not place in the conversation. He'll be a top 15 pick this year. Not a stretch to say another year development he could be in play for the #1 pick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyPhil1781 Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 1 hour ago, big_palooka said: Your Ohio St. bias has not place in the conversation. He'll be a top 15 pick this year. Not a stretch to say another year development he could be in play for the #1 pick. There's no bias here lol. I've just watched him play, guy with a JJ profile pick talking about bias Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
big_palooka Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 1 hour ago, BobbyPhil1781 said: There's no bias here lol. I've just watched him play, guy with a JJ profile pick talking about bias I have a JJ profile pick, because I've watched him play and been a fan early on. Nothing bias about it. He's a good player who is going to make a lot of stat sheet scouts look foolish for doubting him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyPhil1781 Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 40 minutes ago, big_palooka said: I have a JJ profile pick, because I've watched him play and been a fan early on. Nothing bias about it. He's a good player who is going to make a lot of stat sheet scouts look foolish for doubting him. So you draft "good players" top overall? Interesting...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyPhil1781 Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 Here's something to look at.... JJ McCarthy w/o Connor Stalions being involved w/ Michigan football: 7 games 4 TDs, 1 INT 170 YPG It's almost like it's easier to play the position when you know what's happening..... Dude is Taylor Heineki w/ a better arm. Have fun Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaidersAreOne Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 With Harbaugh interviewing with the Falcons and them picking #8, I could see them drafting JJ there and us not even having to worry about him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyPhil1781 Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 29 minutes ago, RaidersAreOne said: With Harbaugh interviewing with the Falcons and them picking #8, I could see them drafting JJ there and us not even having to worry about him. I don't know why he'd take that job assuming the Chargers actually want him as a coach. The situation in LA is just so much better other than being in LA 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaidersAreOne Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 Just now, BobbyPhil1781 said: I don't know why he'd take that job assuming the Chargers actually want him as a coach. The situation in LA is just so much better other than being in LA LA has the QB superiority for sure but Atlanta has a lot of nice pieces. The untapped potential of weapons on O is incredible and they had a very respectable D. Truly they could do so well next year with NFL level of coaching and a new QB. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
big_palooka Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 37 minutes ago, BobbyPhil1781 said: Here's something to look at.... JJ McCarthy w/o Connor Stalions being involved w/ Michigan football: 7 games 4 TDs, 1 INT 170 YPG It's almost like it's easier to play the position when you know what's happening..... Dude is Taylor Heineki w/ a better arm. Have fun No Ohio St. bias at all right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
big_palooka Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 4 minutes ago, RaidersAreOne said: LA has the QB superiority for sure but Atlanta has a lot of nice pieces. The untapped potential of weapons on O is incredible and they had a very respectable D. Truly they could do so well next year with NFL level of coaching and a new QB. And they are in the NFC. Get the QB right, you could have them competing right away in that conference. Why come monkey with Mahomes twice a year when you can play Baker, Carr and Young. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyPhil1781 Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 26 minutes ago, big_palooka said: No Ohio St. bias at all right? So you can't challenge the data but instead, the fandom of the person presenting the numbers? Gotcha, JJ profile pic guy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyPhil1781 Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 31 minutes ago, RaidersAreOne said: LA has the QB superiority for sure but Atlanta has a lot of nice pieces. The untapped potential of weapons on O is incredible and they had a very respectable D. Truly they could do so well next year with NFL level of coaching and a new QB. A much easier division, definitely, but I just feel the Chargers are more prone to success at this moment while ATL is going to take some time. I don't feel as if we got the full potential of the Charger either. I think they vastly underperformed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.