IrishHooligan00 Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 45 minutes ago, Danger said: The only gripe I have, 0% chance we take Kinchens. He's a tweener and doesn't really have the athletic profile to work in the NFL. I don't really see the Tweener...I see a Hard Hitting Instinctual Player. I know hes not the fastest but his Football IQ is huge. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
downundermike Posted April 16 Author Share Posted April 16 I think this might be my best work yet 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scalamania Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 16 hours ago, Danger said: I think I hate the idea of trading up for Latham more than taking graham Barton in the first Dude is no better than OT6 If we trade up for an OL can I request to be banned for 24 hours? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 1 hour ago, IrishHooligan00 said: I don't really see the Tweener...I see a Hard Hitting Instinctual Player. I know hes not the fastest but his Football IQ is huge. Maybe he becomes an OK NFL player, but this is just not the type of player we as an org draft like ever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Last Stand Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 5 minutes ago, Danger said: Maybe he becomes an OK NFL player, but this is just not the type of player we as an org draft like ever. No this puts him off their board id imagine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CasperX22 Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 4 hours ago, Danger said: The only gripe I have, 0% chance we take Kinchens. He's a tweener and doesn't really have the athletic profile to work in the NFL. Disagree to some extent at least. They could view him as a sub package player. Maybe a touch early for such a player, but could be utilized as a LB in sub packages. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 1 hour ago, CasperX22 said: Disagree to some extent at least. They could view him as a sub package player. Maybe a touch early for such a player, but could be utilized as a LB in sub packages. He's just as bad of an Athlete at LB. Eagles don't take players with low Athletic testing numbers period in the last 4 or so years. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CasperX22 Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 Probably right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
downundermike Posted April 17 Author Share Posted April 17 21 hours ago, Danger said: Maybe he becomes an OK NFL player, but this is just not the type of player we as an org draft like ever. I mean, Kam Chancellor was not that great on the RAS scorecard either, he turned out OK. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger Posted April 17 Share Posted April 17 9 minutes ago, downundermike said: I mean, Kam Chancellor was not that great on the RAS scorecard either, he turned out OK. There's always an exception to the rule. And I didn't definitively say that Kinchens wouldn't pan out, just that we wouldn't draft him because it's not our MO. Chancellor worked out in part because he went to a system that inherently worked for him. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger Posted April 17 Share Posted April 17 Also, I think Kam Chancellor a lot of teams would try at WILL as a coverage linebacker and there'd be a better chance of success at that transition than that of Kinchens Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EaglesFlySBChampsHigh Posted April 17 Share Posted April 17 20 hours ago, Danger said: He's just as bad of an Athlete at LB. Eagles don't take players with low Athletic testing numbers period in the last 4 or so years. Gainwell was the only exception I believe unless I missed someone. Gainwell had a terrible RAS scoring. Howie loves high RAS it seems Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Last Stand Posted April 17 Share Posted April 17 3 hours ago, downundermike said: I mean, Kam Chancellor was not that great on the RAS scorecard either, he turned out OK. Chancellor was good almost a decade ago, the safety landscape was completely different back then. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 Wiggins, DeJean, and Kool-Aid were all there at 22, so I moved back 3 spots, and took DeJean who was the lone player to fall. Picked up a 2nd from the Pack next year. Cooper is cooper. Legette is a fun WR prospect with a high ceiling. Orhorhoro was BPA, and allows us to move on from Milton without having to pay him a bigger contract after this season Traded up with Tennessee for Jaden Hicks who was falling. Love this dude. Starting here there weren't any players left that I usually am giddy for, so I just started taking high profile athletes at positions that could use depth. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
babyatemydingo Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 Every mock draft simulator has DeJean falling past 22. I don't know that will be the case. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.