MKnight82 Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 1 minute ago, showtime said: Hmmmm this is interesting. Never thought about Fields in Seattle. What would they have to trade to get him? 3rd? Compete with/learn from Geno. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
showtime Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 1 minute ago, MKnight82 said: 3rd? Compete with/learn from Geno. I'd like to get him for less, but I don't mind Fields. I probably like Fields more than a lot of people here. A change of scenery and a new beginning would do him good. I really want the Seahawks to address the QB position either in the draft or Fields. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 4 minutes ago, showtime said: Hmmmm this is interesting. Never thought about Fields in Seattle. What would they have to trade to get him? Given the options for CHI to trade him to, might not be much Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Haven't read thru the thread, but are the Jets mentioned as a landing spot? If I'm the Jets, I'm curious about him at a low price. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 1 hour ago, showtime said: Hmmmm this is interesting. Never thought about Fields in Seattle. What would they have to trade to get him? At this point, a bag of potato chips might be his going rate. The starting QB market (outside of Denver and maybe New England) is dried up. There's only so many places he can go and has a reasonable chance at winning the starting QB gig. And it's not like Geno Smith has been bad by any means. I just don't see Seattle having interest in him. I think it's probably more likely they go grab a QB in the draft. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 1 hour ago, MKnight82 said: 3rd? Compete with/learn from Geno. At this point, a 4th seems about right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
offbyone Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 3 hours ago, StatKing said: Any GM that trades a third round pick for a backup QB should be shot into the sun. It depends who your starter is and what pick in the 3rd round. But fair point especially because he is on last year of contract and if you don't intend to play him then a 3rd rounder for a rental. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sugashane Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 2 hours ago, showtime said: I'd like to get him for less, but I don't mind Fields. I probably like Fields more than a lot of people here. A change of scenery and a new beginning would do him good. I really want the Seahawks to address the QB position either in the draft or Fields. 1 hour ago, incognito_man said: Haven't read thru the thread, but are the Jets mentioned as a landing spot? If I'm the Jets, I'm curious about him at a low price. Are there any players SEA might be shopping? Obviously key players aside, but anyone that just might end up being traded? Really, I am using this more for a mock dynasty I'm more than anything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sugashane Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 ATM IND makes the most sense. Richardson plays a physical style and will take lumps, both he and Fields are ridiculous athletes so you can run the same offense if Richardson goes down or they are in a blowout (positive or negative). Maybe there can be a pick swap as well to benefit both teams. Bears give 1.9 and Fields for 1.15 and 2.46. That puts Fields' value at a 3rd rounder(3.90) by Drafttek's chart. IND gets to secure the to CB or one of the top OL, Bears get to net another 2nd rounder. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYRaider Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 55 minutes ago, Sugashane said: ATM IND makes the most sense. Richardson plays a physical style and will take lumps, both he and Fields are ridiculous athletes so you can run the same offense if Richardson goes down or they are in a blowout (positive or negative). Maybe there can be a pick swap as well to benefit both teams. Bears give 1.9 and Fields for 1.15 and 2.46. That puts Fields' value at a 3rd rounder(3.90) by Drafttek's chart. IND gets to secure the to CB or one of the top OL, Bears get to net another 2nd rounder. Convert Fields to RB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 1 hour ago, Sugashane said: ATM IND makes the most sense. Richardson plays a physical style and will take lumps, both he and Fields are ridiculous athletes so you can run the same offense if Richardson goes down or they are in a blowout (positive or negative). Maybe there can be a pick swap as well to benefit both teams. Bears give 1.9 and Fields for 1.15 and 2.46. That puts Fields' value at a 3rd rounder(3.90) by Drafttek's chart. IND gets to secure the to CB or one of the top OL, Bears get to net another 2nd rounder. That seems like an overpay with essentially no other teams in the bidding. Mac Jones went for a 6th. I think a 4th is his max value given the limited options of teams remaining 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaguarCrazy2832 Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 I'm kind of shocked it seems like no one is left with an open QB spot unless New England or Washington trade for him...but they likely go QB early. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYRaider Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 (edited) Edited March 13 by NYRaider 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYRaider Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 4 hours ago, JaguarCrazy2832 said: I'm kind of shocked it seems like no one is left with an open QB spot unless New England or Washington trade for him...but they likely go QB early. Raiders, Broncos, Vikings, Seahawks, Giants Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spartacus Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 7 hours ago, NYRaider said: I've been saying this since last year. Turn him into a gadget player and see what he can do. Although he can probably make a great living as a back up. I'm honestly surprised that there wasn't one stupid GM that would have said they could save him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.