GHARMON9 Posted September 29 Share Posted September 29 Truly felt like we gave the Vikings this game, based on the 32 minutes I saw. Love's highs are EXTREMELY high. We are NEVER out of a game with him.... but he's gotta relax. Live another down. But we just made arguably the best defense in the league look underwhelming. Jayden Reed is that guy. Clark and Gary are really starting to piss me off. They gotta give us something. Wicks in a way lost us this game tbh. 4+ drops, plus one being a TD. But man He's shown greatness too much to take him out the game plan. Kicker.... Can we bring back Anderson ? Kraft looks like the next best overall TE in the making... then has a Terrible fumble. If Jaire plays and shadows JJ we win this game no doubt in my mind. VERY excited for this team going forward. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Guy Posted September 29 Share Posted September 29 Just now, GHARMON9 said: Truly felt like we gave the Vikings this game, based on the 32 minutes I saw. Love's highs are EXTREMELY high. We are NEVER out of a game with him.... but he's gotta relax. Live another down. But we just made arguably the best defense in the league look underwhelming. Jayden Reed is that guy. Clark and Gary are really starting to piss me off. They gotta give us something. Wicks in a way lost us this game tbh. 4+ drops, plus one being a TD. But man He's shown greatness too much to take him out the game plan. Kicker.... Can we bring back Anderson ? Kraft looks like the next best overall TE in the making... then has a Terrible fumble. If Jaire plays and shadows JJ we win this game no doubt in my mind. VERY excited for this team going forward. Ya think? LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GHARMON9 Posted September 29 Author Share Posted September 29 Just now, Old Guy said: Ya think? LOL Well tbf, it sounded like the Vikings were dog walking us in the first half. I didn't watch. Were they flat out dominating or were we just f'ing up? The game is 60 minutes not 32. 28-0 usually is a clear indication one team is better. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Striker Posted September 29 Share Posted September 29 Did almost everything wrong and still had a realistic shot at winning. Just need to clean some **** up and keep knocking the rust off. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Striker Posted September 29 Share Posted September 29 1 minute ago, GHARMON9 said: Well tbf, it sounded like the Vikings were dog walking us in the first half. I didn't watch. Were they flat out dominating or were we just f'ing up? The game is 60 minutes not 32. 28-0 usually is a clear indication one team is better. Yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StatKing Posted September 29 Share Posted September 29 Top paid guys have to be better. Absolutely no excuses for Love and Gary being non existent for 2/3rds of the game. The offense did absolutely nothing until Minnesota decided to play soft cover 2 the second half. They were in complete control the entire game and did whatever they wanted to our defense. We were never really in it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Guy Posted September 29 Share Posted September 29 2 minutes ago, GHARMON9 said: Well tbf, it sounded like the Vikings were dog walking us in the first half. I didn't watch. Were they flat out dominating or were we just f'ing up? The game is 60 minutes not 32. 28-0 usually is a clear indication one team is better. So you started a post-game thread with your thoughts on a game you didn't even watch? That is classic! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GHARMON9 Posted September 29 Author Share Posted September 29 Just now, Old Guy said: So you started a post-game thread with your thoughts on a game you didn't even watch? That is classic! You just feel like arguing. I know you see me in the game thread posting. Go play with your grand kids Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Guy Posted September 29 Share Posted September 29 Just now, GHARMON9 said: You just feel like arguing. I know you see me in the game thread posting. Go play with your grand kids Slow down! Here is the first line of your OP. "Truly felt like we gave the Vikings this game, based on the 32 minutes I saw." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deltarich87 Posted September 29 Share Posted September 29 4 minutes ago, GHARMON9 said: Well tbf, it sounded like the Vikings were dog walking us in the first half. I didn't watch. Were they flat out dominating or were we just f'ing up? The game is 60 minutes not 32. 28-0 usually is a clear indication one team is better. Defense got worked that whole half but GB also just simply blew it themselves. They didn't have too many issues moving the ball vs that Vikes defense at all, but they blew their scoring chances with a red zone stall leading to an embarrassing missed 37 yard FG, then they settle for a 48 yard FG that nobody believed he'd make(which he of course didn't) Vikes turned 2 INT into 14 points where they started their drives inside GB territory. 1st INT was Love's fault, 2nd was some stupid dumb luck for the Vikes. Pass was intended for Doubs but Musgrave was underneath and tried making a leaping catch, partially tipping the ball, which then Doubs clanked off his body and right to the Vikes DB who was able to corral it 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StatKing Posted September 29 Share Posted September 29 4 minutes ago, GHARMON9 said: You just feel like arguing. I know you see me in the game thread posting. Go play with your grand kids He's just mad his boy has looked like hot garbage in both games this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
{Family Ghost} Posted September 29 Share Posted September 29 Hafley got schooled in the first half with his passive assed sceheme. A big first half F. Got after it more in the second half and forced some turnovers. You got to bring the heat in this league .. especially when you are down a key guy or two on the outside. Hopefully a lesson was learned by Hafley today. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GHARMON9 Posted September 29 Author Share Posted September 29 3 minutes ago, Old Guy said: Slow down! Here is the first line of your OP. "Truly felt like we gave the Vikings this game, based on the 32 minutes I saw." And did I not ask for clarification on how the first 28 minutes went? The team woke up when I started watching. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StatKing Posted September 29 Share Posted September 29 2 minutes ago, deltarich87 said: Defense got worked that whole half but GB also just simply blew it themselves. They didn't have too many issues moving the ball vs that Vikes defense at all, but they blew their scoring chances with a red zone stall leading to an embarrassing missed 37 yard FG, then they settle for a 48 yard FG that nobody believed he'd make(which he of course didn't) Vikes turned 2 INT into 14 points where they started their drives inside GB territory. 1st INT was Love's fault, 2nd was some stupid dumb luck for the Vikes. Pass was intended for Doubs but Musgrave was underneath and tried making a leaping catch, partially tipping the ball, which then Doubs clanked off his body and right to the Vikes DB who was able to corral it They moved the ball in the 2nd half because the Vikings sat back in a zone 10 yards off the line the whole half. They wanted Love to get impatient and fire a pass into cover 2 and he did just that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatJerkDave Posted September 29 Share Posted September 29 7 minutes ago, GHARMON9 said: Were they flat out dominating or were we just f'ing up? A little bit of both. -Vikings didn't force the Packers to miss 2 FGs. -Vikings didn't force bad throws from Jordan Love. -Vikings didn't force the Packers to commit penalties. -Vikings did dominate the Packers' defensive line. -Vikings did score off of turnovers. -Vikings were able to pressure the QB 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.