Apparition Posted October 14 Share Posted October 14 Same exact roster composition, but McCarthy is swapped out for BB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYRaider Posted October 14 Share Posted October 14 Potentially worse depending on the offensive staff 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starman Posted October 14 Share Posted October 14 If it's BB running the defense and the OC has free reign, at least the Conference round. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scar988 Posted October 15 Share Posted October 15 2-4. Worse. But mainly because offense would be worse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thelonebillsfan Posted October 15 Share Posted October 15 I'd say the conference title game but no farther. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
checkcola Posted October 15 Share Posted October 15 Their problems go beyond coaching. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TVScout Posted October 15 Share Posted October 15 Not much better. Biggest problem is historically bad play calling by the OC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TecmoSuperJoe Posted October 15 Share Posted October 15 Meanwhile... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CP3MVP Posted October 15 Share Posted October 15 1 minute ago, TecmoSuperJoe said: Meanwhile... I actually think Landry is underrated historically if that’s possible. Like he ran into the Lombardi packers dynasty and the steel curtain dynasty. He also kept the cowboys relevant long after His best QB retired(while also running into another 49ers dynasty). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Last Stand Posted October 15 Share Posted October 15 A divisional round loss lol where they’ve been for 30 years Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chiefer Posted October 16 Share Posted October 16 Well if Belichick is there then Jerruh isn’t as involved, but Jerruh always has to be involved so he couldn’t hire Belichick. it’s like the Schrodingers Cat of the NFL. I just don’t see how that sort of marriage could work, although Parcells was there before so who knows. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TVScout Posted October 16 Share Posted October 16 9 hours ago, Chiefer said: Parcells was there I think you contradicted yourself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starman Posted October 16 Share Posted October 16 (edited) On 10/16/2024 at 12:54 AM, Chiefer said: Well if Belichick is there then Jerruh isn’t as involved, but Jerruh always has to be involved so he couldn’t hire Belichick. it’s like the Schrodingers Cat of the NFL. I just don’t see how that sort of marriage could work, although Parcells was there before so who knows. Jerruh is 82 and wants to see one more Lombardi before he dies. Belichick wants to break Shula's all time wins record and win a SB without Brady. I don't think it'd be difficult for both to compromise on what would be a short-term alliance. Edited October 18 by starman 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chiefer Posted October 16 Share Posted October 16 1 hour ago, starman said: Jerruh is 82 and wants to see one more Lombardi before he goes. Belichick wants to break Shula's all time wins record. I don't think it'd be difficult for both to compromise. Exactly he’s 82 his mind is compromised Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiwibrown Posted October 16 Share Posted October 16 Depends ifnhe brings his guys in. If he demands his own offense and oc they have no hope. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.