deltarich87 Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 This is a bit higher than I expected tbh. I like Davante but that's elite WR money(top 5 in the league). Age is in his favor/teams favor so you'd expect his best production will be the next 3-4 seasons during this contract Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cheesehawk Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 4 minutes ago, deltarich87 said: This is a bit higher than I expected tbh. I like Davante but that's elite WR money(top 5 in the league). Age is in his favor/teams favor so you'd expect his best production will be the next 3-4 seasons during this contract this contract is going to look really sweet by year 2. I love it. Davante is a playmaker and that’s what we need here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted December 29, 2017 Author Share Posted December 29, 2017 6 minutes ago, deltarich87 said: This is a bit higher than I expected tbh. I like Davante but that's elite WR money(top 5 in the league). Age is in his favor/teams favor so you'd expect his best production will be the next 3-4 seasons during this contract The OBJ, Mike Evans, Cooks, Diggs and to a lesser extent Funchess and Benjamin FA class next year will reset the whole market. Adams will be just inside the top 10 where he belongs IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 I'm really curious to see the structure of the contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted December 29, 2017 Author Share Posted December 29, 2017 1 minute ago, CWood21 said: I'm really curious to see the structure of the contract. We know the SB is 18m, so that will pro-rate to 4.5m per year. I wonder if any base is guaranteed? 4/58 with 18m guaranteed is great for us IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 1 minute ago, Packerraymond said: We know the SB is 18m, so that will pro-rate to 4.5m per year. I wonder if any base is guaranteed? 4/58 with 18m guaranteed is great for us IMO. For some reason I was thinking that any extension had to be completed before a certain week. Am I mistaken in that? Like if a deal was signed after Week 10, you couldn't pro-rate it over the previous contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted December 29, 2017 Author Share Posted December 29, 2017 Just now, CWood21 said: For some reason I was thinking that any extension had to be completed before a certain week. Am I mistaken in that? Like if a deal was signed after Week 10, you couldn't pro-rate it over the previous contract. I honestly have no idea what you're referring to. We usually always sign a guy late so I doubt that's the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 Hopefully this means we move on either Cobb or Nelson, preferably the former. This much money tied up in 3 WRs is wayyyy overboard especially given our vast deficiencies on defense. Ideally I'd rather give $14 million to a top 10 CB or pass rusher. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 Just now, Packerraymond said: I honestly have no idea what you're referring to. We usually always sign a guy late so I doubt that's the case. For some reason I was thinking there was a cutoff when you could pro-rate an extension into the previous contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jleisher Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 29 minutes ago, deltarich87 said: The final nail for one of Cobb/Jordy. Not sure who the team moves on from or if they keep both but one of them takes a paycut(Jordy maybe?) Jordy retires as player in the NFL, and stays with Packers as the WR coach. Winner, winner, chicken dinner!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deltarich87 Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 8 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: We know the SB is 18m, so that will pro-rate to 4.5m per year. I wonder if any base is guaranteed? 4/58 with 18m guaranteed is great for us IMO. Doing the deal now means they can spread out the SB over 5 yrs. Remember, they had something around $10 million left of cap space this season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 Just now, deltarich87 said: Doing the deal now means they can spread out the SB over 5 yrs. Remember, they had something around $10 million left of cap space this season That puts the Packers close to their customary $7M they roll over as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siman08/OH Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 I firmly believe if all 4 of Rodgers/Adams/Cobb/Nelson are healthy together for 16 games that we arnt arguing over salaries. We have will be going into next season with three guys capable of 80/1000/10 seasons. Nelson was on his way before the injury. So was Adams if he didn’t miss pretty much 4 games to concussion. And Rodgers loves Cobb, that’s a known fact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 Some speculation from our own @justo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 2 minutes ago, Siman08/OH said: I firmly believe if all 4 of Rodgers/Adams/Cobb/Nelson are healthy together for 16 games that we arnt arguing over salaries. We have will be going into next season with three guys capable of 80/1000/10 seasons. Nelson was on his way before the injury. So was Adams if he didn’t miss pretty much 4 games to concussion. And Rodgers loves Cobb, that’s a known fact. Unfortunately, given their age I'm not sure it's totally reasonable to count on Nelson and Cobb to be healthy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.