Leader Posted December 9, 2019 Author Share Posted December 9, 2019 Andy Herman - Today’s victory didn’t seem dominant. And there’s a lot to cleanup. But to throw things back to 2010, in Week 14 the Packers lost 7-3 to the Lions, fell to 8-5 on the season, lost Rodgers to injury, and were set to go to New England. There were lots of issues then too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted December 9, 2019 Share Posted December 9, 2019 2 minutes ago, Leader said: Andy Herman - Today’s victory didn’t seem dominant. And there’s a lot to cleanup. But to throw things back to 2010, in Week 14 the Packers lost 7-3 to the Lions, fell to 8-5 on the season, lost Rodgers to injury, and were set to go to New England. There were lots of issues then too. We're really a QB and DC removing their heads from their collective butts away from getting there. Pettine is slowly getting there. Rodgers had completely removed his until Adams came back, now there isn't even daylight where he's got his. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted December 9, 2019 Author Share Posted December 9, 2019 5 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: We're really a QB and DC removing their heads from their collective butts away from getting there. Pettine is slowly getting there. Rodgers had completely removed his until Adams came back, now there isn't even daylight where he's got his. But Adams didnt do much of anything today. 4 receptions on 6 targets for 41 yards (long 15). Meh. How much of a factor is it that defenses have adjusted to what we're doing on offense - blunted it - and we've not responded by changing things up? Is that playing in to our difficulties? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted December 9, 2019 Share Posted December 9, 2019 4 minutes ago, Leader said: But Adams didnt do much of anything today. 4 receptions on 6 targets for 41 yards (long 15). Meh. How much of a factor is it that defenses have adjusted to what we're doing on offense - blunted it - and we've not responded by changing things up? Is that playing in to our difficulties? I couldn't tell you until I see our QB actually attempt to run the offense as called. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacReady Posted December 9, 2019 Share Posted December 9, 2019 Aaron Rodgers is trash and Aaron Rodgers was not trash in 2010. That’s the difference. Our defense in 2010 being the best in the league and it being 13th best in the league also contributes to that difference. We ain’t winning **** in the playoffs except maybe the wildcard, and maybe the divisional round if someone on the opposing team does something really stupid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted December 9, 2019 Author Share Posted December 9, 2019 Ryan Wood - NFC playoff seeds Week 15: 1. 49ers (11-2) 2. Packers (10-3) 3. Saints (10-3, conference record tiebreaker) 4. Cowboys (6-7) 5. Seahawks (10-3) 6. Vikings (9-4) Packers are assured at least the 2 seed if they win final three games. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted December 9, 2019 Author Share Posted December 9, 2019 1 minute ago, Packerraymond said: I couldn't tell you until I see our QB actually attempt to run the offense as called. Well then....I've mentioned this before....but IMO thats a HC matter. I know.....I know.....the power dynamics arent right for that.....but thats how I see it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexGreen#20 Posted December 9, 2019 Share Posted December 9, 2019 26 minutes ago, Leader said: Andy Herman - Today’s victory didn’t seem dominant. And there’s a lot to cleanup. But to throw things back to 2010, in Week 14 the Packers lost 7-3 to the Lions, fell to 8-5 on the season, lost Rodgers to injury, and were set to go to New England. There were lots of issues then too. People need to stop making comparisons to the 2010 team. That's not what this is Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted December 9, 2019 Author Share Posted December 9, 2019 1 minute ago, AlexGreen#20 said: People need to stop making comparisons to the 2010 team. That's not what this is Known. Different talents. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexGreen#20 Posted December 9, 2019 Share Posted December 9, 2019 Just now, Leader said: Known. Different talents. So stop doing it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted December 9, 2019 Share Posted December 9, 2019 1 minute ago, AlexGreen#20 said: People need to stop making comparisons to the 2010 team. That's not what this is Talent wise, no. However it does illustrate that you can go from playing meh football to peak football in less than a game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted December 9, 2019 Author Share Posted December 9, 2019 Just now, AlexGreen#20 said: So stop doing it? LOL How did I know this was going there? First - I didnt do it. Second - I dont believe the comment was offered as an in depth analysis. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted December 9, 2019 Share Posted December 9, 2019 GB chance in the playoffs will come down to how well the D can generate turnovers. They are not a team that will likely beat itself with turnovers, so getting 2-3 extra possessions will be a huge key in how far GB can advance. It just does not seem like a very winning formula against playoff teams....who are typically good at the TO margin. Winning that battle 3 or 4 games against playoff caliber teams will be tough Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexGreen#20 Posted December 9, 2019 Share Posted December 9, 2019 3 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: Talent wise, no. However it does illustrate that you can go from playing meh football to peak football in less than a game. The really good 2010 team having a bad week against an average Lions team, is not comparable to the really average 2019 team having an average week against the God awful Redskins. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gopackgo972 Posted December 9, 2019 Share Posted December 9, 2019 1 minute ago, AlexGreen#20 said: The really good 2010 team having a bad week against an average Lions team, is not comparable to the really average 2019 team having an average week against the God awful Redskins. How bad are the Skins really? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.