Jump to content

Random Packer News & Notes


Leader

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Outpost31 said:

Nobody is interested.

I get it... but I like the human side of the sport too. And heart breaking losses add to the lore of the game and teams.

Like maybe it was discussed during the time but Bostick said that was his first time on an onside kick. He knew his job but first time in the situation his offensive mindset took over to attack the ball. Just interesting...

to me at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Leader said:

Andy Herman -  The four players in 2019 whose play most swung the success for the Packers:

Blake Martinez
Darnell Savage
Aaron Rodgers
Bryan Bulaga

Not sure how you don't put Amos in there or Z Smith.  Savage/Martinez seem pretty replaceable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, skibrett15 said:

Not sure how you don't put Amos in there or Z Smith.  Savage/Martinez seem pretty replaceable.

The name that came to my mind was Aaron Jones....but hey, its his evaluation.
He had a point system posted that I didnt bring over cause there was no explanation how the values were achieved (player or positional production/value) which makes them difficult to assess.

Edited by Leader
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, skibrett15 said:

Not sure how you don't put Amos in there or Z Smith.  Savage/Martinez seem pretty replaceable.

Z Smith, P Smith, Amos were improvements for the defense.

Aaron Jones on offense.  Maybe better OL play there as well.

Team chemistry overall, team health as factors also

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Leader said:

Andy Herman -  The four players in 2019 whose play most swung the success for the Packers:

Blake Martinez
Darnell Savage
Aaron Rodgers
Bryan Bulaga

I assume he means the teams success correlated to these guy’s performances, not which players helped the Packers most this year. 
 

ie if they had a good game, Packers on the whole performed well. If they didn’t, the Packers did poorly. 

Edited by mikebpackfan
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jimmy Garoppolo's QB rating by receiver:

Kyle Juszczyk: 122.1
Kendrick Bourne: 121.2
Raheem Mostert: 119.5
George Kittle: 119.4
Deebo Samuel: 109.2
Richie James: 97.9
Ross Dwelley: 87.5
Matt Breida: 85.6
Emmanuel Sanders: 85.5
Tevin Coleman: 82.6
Dante Pettis: 52.3

  • Peter Bukowski - We should have traded for Emmanuel Sanders. It was a miscalculation. They expected — as I did — GMO would be the guy we saw early last year. He wasn’t. EQ gets hurt. MVS goes into witness protection. I don’t think it was crazy to think they’d be OK. They just turned out to be wrong.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, mikebpackfan said:

I assume he means the teams success correlated to these guy’s performances, not which players helped the Packers most this year. 
 

ie if they had a good game, Packers on the whole performed well. If they didn’t, the Packers did poorly. 

It is still kind of dumb. If you take someone not listed (Z) and replace him with someone below replacement level, the below replacement level’s played would have a large impact on the game 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, mikebpackfan said:

I assume he means the teams success correlated to these guy’s performances, not which players helped the Packers most this year. 
 

ie if they had a good game, Packers on the whole performed well. If they didn’t, the Packers did poorly. 

How is Aaron Jones not on that list then? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...